name='PP Mguire' said:Look at the watts they are using, they are doing just that.
If AMD doesn't offer anything better than the current C2D performance, I'll be waiting for Nehalem before I upgrade next. Penryn is purely a step-down in node size...where-as Nehalem is 45nm on a completely new architecture.name='FghtinIrshNvrDie' said:I'm hoping they leak some early phenom benches, otherwise Penryn will be entertaining me this fall.
Ryan
name='NickS' said:I'm pretty pumped for Phenom later this year. Hopefully it at least ties C2D.
name='PV5150' said:Penryn is purely a step-down in node size...where-as Nehalem is 45nm on a completely new architecture.
...in preparation for the new architecturename='FghtinIrshNvrDie' said:Not from what I've read. It has a few IPC improvements, and has an expanded cache.
Ryan
Who isnt on the inside??Even though I currently own a C2D I would much rather AMD were back on top of the gaming market so I could move back over as I am bit of an AMD fanboy