AMD Market Share Crash, 3 out of 4 use Nvidia GPUs

WYP

News Guru
AMD's Market Share has Crashed, with 3 out of 4 PC gamers using Nvidia GPUs. AMD really need to get their next generation out and soon.

19090503953l.jpg


Read more on the AMD Market Share Crash and Nvidia's rise to over 75% here.
 
Last edited:
How are those figures calculated? At any rate, AMD clearly don't have a clue as to what they are doing. Even if the 390 is some godly power house, it's almost certain that Pascal will blow it out of the water. It's hard to see AMD recovering so much lost ground any time soon.
 
Damn... even I was somewhat of a "AMD fanboy" recently... but I'm going over to Nvidia now to be honest hehe :p
 
I hope the 300 series is a massive success because if AMD go out of business, there will be no competition to Nvidia which will mean less technological breakthroughs.

If amd went under Nvidia would have very costly anti trust investigations to deal with, and with total market dominance why innovate?

Just look at american ISPs, no competition so none of them will upgrade their infrastructure. Why improve when staying the same gives you the same profits?
 
It's really sad that the 290X would of smashed nVidia's offering if AMD could have just put it across in the right way. They do some good work and if they learn from their mistakes with the 390X i'm sure they will survive.

JR
 
Last edited:
It's really sad that the 290X would of smashed nVidia's offering if AMD could have just put it across in the right way. They do some good work and if they learn from their mistakes with the 390X i'm sure they will survive.

JR

Restricting the vendors to amd's stock cooler on the 290x was a bad call, one that probably cost them quite a lot of sales on that card. I hope that the 300 series has a proper cooler on it, and if not, atleast let the vendors loose on the aftermarket coolers straight away.
 
Restricting the vendors to amd's stock cooler on the 290x was a bad call, one that probably cost them quite a lot of sales on that card. I hope that the 300 series has a proper cooler on it, and if not, atleast let the vendors loose on the aftermarket coolers straight away.

+1, if there is a Lightning on day one then it will look magnificent. I hope they avoid the AIO route because that is just feeding their own trolls even if it is a good idea.

JR
 
It takes AMD forever to release new GPUs and Nvidia came in hard with GTX 900 pricing. So this is not surprising. Not to mention that Nvidia Gameworks include titles like The Witcher 3 and Arkham Knight and they bundle those games with their cards in some cases. AMD games like Square-Enix titles are still far away from being released. Some have only just been announced.

But I just don't trust Nvidia enough to buy their overpriced cards. I don't like their proprietary G-sync, I don't like PhysX and after how they "handled" the 970 fiasco I find it hard to justify spending money on an Nvidia GPU. I'd rather wait for AMD even if it takes a while. Besides, I enjoy Square-Enix titles a lot and it's not like The Witcher 3 and Arkham Knight will suffer on AMD. I played the previous titles in those series just fine.
 
Last edited:
How are those figures calculated? At any rate, AMD clearly don't have a clue as to what they are doing. Even if the 390 is some godly power house, it's almost certain that Pascal will blow it out of the water. It's hard to see AMD recovering so much lost ground any time soon.
Figures are calculated based on end of year accounts, AMD have had nothing but trouble and a hard time of it, what with being cruelly levered out of the market by Intel for a long time they took a huge hit financially for that, the Hynix factory blaze early last year lost them development time and materials, they then dropped TSMC as a silicon supplier (big mistake) in favour of manufacturing their own which never panned out and so they return to TSMC, again slowing production.. in a small attempt at saving money they then globally laid off many members of staff including some CEOs. The Catalyst drivers have been extremely slow in development and rather lacking in any major improvements, Nvidia has smashed ahead with Maxwell and rightly so, the architecture is simply magnificent and energy savvy :cool:. With all that said despite catalyst issues the 280/290/295x2 are still fantastic cards at fantastic prices and you'd have to be mental to ignore them.

As for Pascal, it looks great on paper in even during the GDC it was praised as being the next big thing, I'll be blown away if Nvidia get it to do everything they claim when it's launched. If it does I'll print this thread off and eat it on camera. ;)
 
If AMD doesn't get their act together with the 300 series, they may not be able to come back as a leading manufacturer. As well as they do with budget cards, that's not what generates good profits. A big problem is that AMD is behind Nvidia as they appear to be responding to Nvidia's cards instead of leaping ahead. If their response to the 900 series isn't strong enough, things won't go well for them.
 
Figures are calculated based on end of year accounts, AMD have had nothing but trouble and a hard time of it, what with being cruelly levered out of the market by Intel for a long time they took a huge hit financially for that, the Hynix factory blaze early last year lost them development time and materials, they then dropped TSMC as a silicon supplier (big mistake) in favour of manufacturing their own which never panned out and so they return to TSMC, again slowing production.. in a small attempt at saving money they then globally laid off many members of staff including some CEOs. The Catalyst drivers have been extremely slow in development and rather lacking in any major improvements, Nvidia has smashed ahead with Maxwell and rightly so, the architecture is simply magnificent and energy savvy :cool:. With all that said despite catalyst issues the 280/290/295x2 are still fantastic cards at fantastic prices and you'd have to be mental to ignore them.

As for Pascal, it looks great on paper in even during the GDC it was praised as being the next big thing, I'll be blown away if Nvidia get it to do everything they claim when it's launched. If it does I'll print this thread off and eat it on camera. ;)

Naked.....then you have a deal ;)

Its such a shame AMD can't challenge nVidia head to head, now my last AMD cards were 7970's xfire and i wont lie they were beasts, but i was riddled with too many issues with xfire, i like to have games for release day and if AMD cant provide decent xfire profile in time then it makes me question my purchase.

Now ive always owned AMD/ATi cards the only nVidia gpu i bought was some shitty 5800 i think, and 8800GT now the 8800GT was a game changer in nVidia history, and i personally believe the 780 & 980 are exceptional gpus' untouchable in there respective classes, which i why im happy to pay the premium.

But i stick by what ive always said, if AMD were to release something that was a absolute monster beyond reasonble doubt and made drivers and xfire profiles that worked on release day for games, id switch, why, because dropping £500 on new gpu's every so often gets unnecessarily expensive, not to say i dont have the money but why spend more than you have to? But then again this is all relative to said AMD gpu being sub £400.

Im sure im not the only person who would do this, i can understand R&D is expensive but AMD have no idea how much the consumer wants them to bring something to wipe the floor with nVidia!
 
As for Pascal, it looks great on paper in even during the GDC it was praised as being the next big thing, I'll be blown away if Nvidia get it to do everything they claim when it's launched. If it does I'll print this thread off and eat it on camera. ;)

Well I'll keep you to that promise ;)

Naked.....then you have a deal ;)

Its such a shame AMD can't challenge nVidia head to head, now my last AMD cards were 7970's xfire and i wont lie they were beasts, but i was riddled with too many issues with xfire, i like to have games for release day and if AMD cant provide decent xfire profile in time then it makes me question my purchase.

Now ive always owned AMD/ATi cards the only nVidia gpu i bought was some shitty 5800 i think, and 8800GT now the 8800GT was a game changer in nVidia history, and i personally believe the 780 & 980 are exceptional gpus' untouchable in there respective classes, which i why im happy to pay the premium.

But i stick by what ive always said, if AMD were to release something that was a absolute monster beyond reasonble doubt and made drivers and xfire profiles that worked on release day for games, id switch, why, because dropping £500 on new gpu's every so often gets unnecessarily expensive, not to say i dont have the money but why spend more than you have to? But then again this is all relative to said AMD gpu being sub £400.

Im sure im not the only person who would do this, i can understand R&D is expensive but AMD have no idea how much the consumer wants them to bring something to wipe the floor with nVidia!

That was some interesting reading MrKambo, almost have the same thoughts as me regarding switching etc :) ... very nice reading! :)
 
In all seriousness though. AMD is in deep shit. Maybe not as deep as Greece is, but deep.
AMD needs new technologies, better silicon, that can do more for less. I believe in Dr.Lisa Su The President and CEO. Problem is that they don't make enough money to beat NVIDIA's and Intel's ass. The friendly dude called Roy who was in charge of AMD managed to kinda stop the company bleeding, but that witheld innovations. For AMD now time is money, and time is crucial for their survival.
 
I have strong faith in Zen and how that architecture will scale up/down on the server, high end consumer and low consumption markets. Plus they are developing arm which would be usefull for gpus possibly in he future. Now, about their gpu development, I dont think the 300 series will be a big deal, they are still on 28nm, and their development probably started before their share downfall. So, I'm more of looking forward to 2016 for any sort of significant leap in gpu performance, given that they jump to much better fabrication nodes and design better architectures.

Now on apus, they have a big advantage over intel : They develop gpu cores for many years, and they can use that technology to make better apus. Now most of you here believe that apus arent important and high end stuff is what is all about, but in fact apus power a very big chunk of laptop sales, plus they might get some foot on the tablet market. ( I am now aware of any exact numbers, but that's true ). Now couple that with a necessary increase in efficiency and a big drop in consumption, and here we have some very intresting products.
 
I replaced my 280x with a 980 GTX

To be fair, the 280x served me quite well.

I don't get the Antitrust shit though

If nVidia brings out new hardware that trumps AMD and is able to market it well and succeed in market share why is that to the fault of nVidia?
 
I don't get the Antitrust shit though

If nVidia brings out new hardware that trumps AMD and is able to market it well and succeed in market share why is that to the fault of nVidia?

^ This +1 ... and why does everyone write "nVidia", is that how they are written? and not "Nvidia"? :huh:...
 
^ This +1 ... and why does everyone write "nVidia", is that how they are written? and not "Nvidia"? :huh:...

http://www.quora.com/How-did-Nvidia-get-its-name

main-qimg-bf76c7b886ea98958df183d11363be95
perhaps? It's a stupid name however you write it or pronounce it.

Anyway, AMD are a company and they have to adapt or die, simple as. As mentioned in the article if Nvidia become the sole creator of high-end gpu's, they can command the market price and perform a technology progression slow-burn, which we wouldn't like to see.

I've had a lot of AMD/ATI gpu's in my past - 9800, x1800 crossfire, x1900 crossfire, HD4870, but I've been on the green side for the past few years. I'm no fanboy to either side, I do hope AMD get their shit together.
 
Back
Top