I really wish they would do more with their mobile architecture. Imagine how much better there 40 compute units would perform with their newest architecture? Would be an astounding difference in all areas performance, perf/Watt, FSR4 benefits, cooler running, etc.
I really wish they would do more with their mobile architecture. Imagine how much better there 40 compute units would perform with their newest architecture? Would be an astounding difference in all areas performance, perf/Watt, FSR4 benefits, cooler running, etc.
I really wish they would do more with their mobile architecture. Imagine how much better there 40 compute units would perform with their newest architecture? Would be an astounding difference in all areas performance, perf/Watt, FSR4 benefits, cooler running, etc.
RDNA 4 would take up a lot more die space, but I do agree. Not waiting for RDNA 4 was a mistake. As it stands, every Radeon integrated graphics solution is outdated at launch. Even if Strix Halo beats Intel Panther Lake in gaming, its bad FSR 2/3 upscaling and frame generation give Intel the quality advantage.
The only reason RDNA 3.5 was acceptable was because Nvidia did not compete in this space. Without FSR 4 upscaling on RDNA 3+, it is hard to recommend AMD's integrated solutions for gaming. They are certainly usable, but not the best they could be. AMD is giving itself a lot of negativity for no real reason. An RDNA 4 iGPU would have transformed the gaming handheld space and laptop markets. Strix Halo with an RDNA 4 GPU would be insane!