AMD Fury X 3DMARK Performance Leak

WYP

News Guru
AMD's Fury X has just had it's 3DMARK performance Leaked, showing it beat the GTX 980Ti and the Titan X.

10110555465l.jpg


Read more on the AMD Radeon Fury X's 3DMARK performance here.
 
I think the only genuine result is the on in your OP, the rest in the graph can not be found on the Futuremark database.
 
If this leaked information is accurate - and I hope it is - I've gotta say nice job AMD! Now, if this performance is indeed verified come launch day, I wonder what price point we'll be seeing this card at? I'd suspect not the usually aggressively low price we generally expect from AMD, but a price more in line with NV's high-end parts perhaps. Price war incoming?

While I'm an nVidia fan, I'd take some perverse satisfaction seeing them on the back foot when an AMD card trumps their high-end product.

After the outcry of disappointment over the 300 series rebrand, this is exactly the sort of leak AMD need.

Scoob.
 
Hopefully it comes in at no more than $750.. I don't think Nvidia could lower the price on the TX that low because it'll really shake up the high end market. No one would want to be spending another $250 for nearly identical cards based off this leak.
 
I hope the information is not accurate as it is not very impressive.

I am looking to buy the new AMD card but want a bit more than that.

Here is a comparison of the result in your OP and one of my EVGA SC TXs, please use the graphics scores to compare not the overall score.

The first is the result in your OP.

The second is my EVGA SC TX @stock.

The third is my EVGA SC TX overclocked.

MLkDBgP.jpg


http://www.3dmark.com/compare/fs/5036776/fs/5051316/fs/5051420
 
Thing is Kaap you have your 5960x overclocked because your physics score is higher. I know from experience that a better, or higher clocked CPU can help to increase the graphics score.
 
Thing is Kaap you have your 5960x overclocked because your physics score is higher. I know from experience that a better, or higher clocked CPU can help to increase the graphics score.

Not with a single card on that bench, you don't need much speed at all from the CPU.

The point is I don't think the leak is genuine and my post is only to highlight the massive difference on a bench that is traditionally friendly to AMD.
 
Not with a single card on that bench, you don't need much speed at all from the CPU.

The point is I don't think the leak is genuine and my post is only to highlight the massive difference on a bench that is traditionally friendly to AMD.

TBH i've noticed every benchmark does better on Nvidia hardware because each bench overly does the amount of Tessellation which Nvidia do better in because they typically have had more TMU's than their equal AMD counterpart.
 
Thing is Kaap you have your 5960x overclocked because your physics score is higher. I know from experience that a better, or higher clocked CPU can help to increase the graphics score.

Here is a fun one to make the point

EVGA SC TX @stock

5960X @1.2ghz - this is as slow as it will go, even your phone runs faster.:D

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/7282130

If you check the graphics score, it has made no difference running the CPU @1.2ghz lol.:)
 
Firestrike Extreme vs Firestrike?


Seconded, I thought I had missed something, I'm curious as to what it is supposed to mean too.

Maybe it's because the score posted for the 290x is so low for the clocks, is it an example of fudgy fudgery??
 
Last edited:
I hope the information is not accurate as it is not very impressive.

I am looking to buy the new AMD card but want a bit more than that.

Here is a comparison of the result in your OP and one of my EVGA SC TXs, please use the graphics scores to compare not the overall score.

The first is the result in your OP.

The second is my EVGA SC TX @stock.

The third is my EVGA SC TX overclocked.

MLkDBgP.jpg


http://www.3dmark.com/compare/fs/5036776/fs/5051316/fs/5051420

Ouch. Yeah, I thought this would happen to AMD. If they have to watercool it from stock, then it has no OC potential yet Maxwell excels in that area. RIP AMD
 
Back
Top