B balilu New member Apr 21, 2005 #1 look at this guys http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2397
M muffin New member Apr 21, 2005 #2 I'm permanently confuzzled by this, and can never remember when someone tells me, but take the case of the 4200+, is it; 2 cores, operating at 1100MHz each or 2 cores, operating at 2200MHz each I promise to pay attention this time if someone tells me
I'm permanently confuzzled by this, and can never remember when someone tells me, but take the case of the 4200+, is it; 2 cores, operating at 1100MHz each or 2 cores, operating at 2200MHz each I promise to pay attention this time if someone tells me
J JN New member Apr 21, 2005 #3 2 cores at 1.1ghz Think of dual core as a physical form of hyperthreading (but better)
M muffin New member Apr 21, 2005 #4 XMS said: 2 cores at 1.1ghz Think of dual core as a physical form of hyperthreading (but better) Click to expand... Right, I'm physically punching it into my head now. Thankyou :worship:
XMS said: 2 cores at 1.1ghz Think of dual core as a physical form of hyperthreading (but better) Click to expand... Right, I'm physically punching it into my head now. Thankyou :worship:
F FarFarAway New member Apr 21, 2005 #5 XMS said: 2 cores at 1.1ghz Think of dual core as a physical form of hyperthreading (but better) Click to expand... So is this a lot quicker than one FX-55 then? Games don't support HT, only single threading....so will this benefit gaming performance? I'm confuzzled too!
XMS said: 2 cores at 1.1ghz Think of dual core as a physical form of hyperthreading (but better) Click to expand... So is this a lot quicker than one FX-55 then? Games don't support HT, only single threading....so will this benefit gaming performance? I'm confuzzled too!