Alleged Ampere GPU performance numbers appear on the 3DMARK database

[WYP]

This GPU is almost 31% faster than an RTX 2080 Ti.



Read more about Nvidia's Ampere Graphics Performance.

 

[Bagpuss]

Fits in with rumours of them being around 50% faster than the 2xxx cards, which would most likely make this particular card a vanilla 3080, given the average 20-30% performance advantage the Ti has over the vanilla 2080.


..Not enough of a speed bump to make me upgrade from my 2080 but would be a very nice upgrade for those on 10xx series cards.


..A 3090 would be the only real worthwhile jump from a 2080, IMO. But I'm simply not prepared to spend £1k (or more) on a GPU, I'll leave that to the 'more money than sense', mob.

 

[m2geek]

Fits in with rumours of them being around 50% faster than the 2xxx cards, which would most likely make this particular card a vanilla 3080, given the average 20-30% performance advantage the Ti has over the vanilla 2080.


..Not enough of a speed bump to make me upgrade from my 2080 but would be a very nice upgrade for those on 10xx series cards.


..A 3090 would be the only real worthwhile jump from a 2080, IMO. But I'm simply not prepared to spend £1k (or more) on a GPU, I'll leave that to the 'more money than sense', mob.

I'm still rocking a strix 1080 advanced (has the gddr5x memory) - glad I waited for the 3xxx series to upgrade. Gonna be a Massive upgrade haha.

 

[AngryGoldfish]

People seem to think this is the flagship 3090/3080 Super/3080Ti. And then some feel that 30% over a 2080Ti is "crushing". I know that the clock speeds seemed low, but I would have imagined this was the 3080.

 

[Avet]

People seem to think this is the flagship 3090/3080 Super/3080Ti. And then some feel that 30% over a 2080Ti is "crushing". I know that the clock speeds seemed low, but I would have imagined this was the 3080.

Yea. 30% with the same core count with 7nm improvements and faster memory is doable.