That GPU score puts it in 1080Ti territory but the i9 7900X has to have helped tonnes overall especially if you cross reference with our own Time spy scores.
That GPU score puts it in 1080Ti territory but the i9 7900X has to have helped tonnes overall especially if you cross reference with our own Time spy scores.
I was a bit confuddled when I read "significantly better than a 1080 Ti" when I have a score that is a few points higher than this supposed 2080 score with a 1080 Ti ^_^
Fake news. It can't be significantly faster than a 1080Ti if it does not beat my Titan XP.
Look at the graphics score.
4932. The 2080 supposedly scores 4925. Couple more things to bear in mind.
1. Unlike the last "leak" this time they are using a real CPU. Which of course will bump up all of the scores. It always does. That was why I bought a 3970x, because I was tired of getting crap benchmark scores due to having a quad core CPU.
2. I doubt that card is overclocked. If it is though? then IMO it will be *dead* even with a 1080Ti. The problem? it costs around the same.
It is also the punier Turing card, meaning it will be about as useful for RT as a chocolate teapot, given even the £1100 2080Ti can only manage 1080p.
Oh yeah, I have another 20mhz boost to play with too. I have my card at "dead stable overclock for everything" ATM. I could push higher for the benchmark if I wanted (don't have the time to be rebooting the PC etc ATM)
Given that at the moment all unboxings and every reviewer is stating the same thing... "We have no Drivers" So that being said if this is to be believed it's just a generic vga adapter driver.
The graphics score on my XP is higher. My CPU score is way lower, due to them using a better CPU which will affect the overall score. So the way to get around it is just look at the graphics score.
I have an XP, not an Xp which is a good 5% faster.
Oh and "Out of the box" Turing is already overclocking itself with a new app.