XSPC Razor R9 290/290X Water-Block Review

WYP

News Guru
Manufacturer - XSPC
Price - £97.79

The launch of the R9 290X left users and reviewers with mixed thoughts, the card was a good performer but thermals and acoustics left Nvidia's existion options remain Supreme.

Over time this changed as 3rd parties like MSI or ASUS have brought us more advanced coolers which not just let AMD's Hawaii core run at its rated clock speeds but allow some real overclocking to be possible.

290x-led11_zpsa4027eaa.jpg


Today we look at XSPC's Razor Water-Block for the R9 290/290X, is water cooling required when so many good air based coolers are on the market?

Aesthetics

As far as aesthetics are concerned, the XSPC Razor R9 290X block uses the same styling XSPC has used since their Raystorm series, so this model will fit in perfectly into an existing XSPC loop.

IMG_02161_zpsf1530ed9.jpg

5d00cd8b-f70f-4a6c-ad4d-b11f6d8ee175_zps2f792d4c.jpg
IMG_0154_zpsda035e0b.jpg


The Water Block base is made of copper, with a stainless steel plate between the copper base and the Acrylic top. This acrylic top has 2x3mm holes for the placement of LEDs which can illuminate the block.

The Blocks Multiport connector gives the user a great deal of tube routing options with it's 7 G1/4" ports. XSPC also supplies you with 5 black chrome stoppers for your unused ports .

290x-led2.jpg
10_zps0baee093.jpg


On the face of the water block is a black Brushed aluminium faceplate, which can be removed for potential painting or replacement.

IMG_02051_zps04460255.jpg


Packaging

The Block Comes packages in a single cardbord box with the block, fittings and LEDs neatly packaged separate bubble wrap bags and held in place with thick pieces of soft foam. This package could travel through anything but a raging fire and arrive at your door undamaged, +1 XSPC.

IMG_0165_zps30093405.jpg


As far as accessories go there are the before mentioned G1/4" stoppers, thermal tape for the GPUs ram and VRMs, XSPCs thermal compound for your GPU core, a set of XSPC Blue LEDs and all your requires washers and screws for Installation.

290x-4.jpg


Overclocking and thermal performance.


For testing Today I will be using a Sapphire R9 290 Tri-X, given it used a AMD reference PCB. Results from testing this GPU will be cpmpared to when using this water block and using this Water block when Overclocked.

GPU-ZR9290_zpse40677ca.jpg


I managed to overclock by 150MHz on the core and by 250MHz on the GPU's memory, impressive given the reference R9 290 series cards could not even run at their stock speeds consistently.

As always the silicon lottery applies, your chip will be limited regardless of the cooling method used.

Thermals

Under load water cooling tames the volcano stored within AMD's Hawaii GPU core. Comparing the water block to sapphires yields a 32 degree drop in load temps and a staggering 53 degrees cooler than AMDs reference design.

When the watercooled GPU is overclocked the temps remain equally as impressive with only a 9 degrees increase in load temperature.

3dmark11_zps0d6f8572.jpg


As far a noise is concerned the waterblock is as silent as the loop you attach it too, if you use leaf-blower for fans and a pump from a hydro electric dam noise will be a problem, but if like me you cherish silence and combine this Block with the right fans, radiators and pump you will be treated with silent operation, great thermals and overclocks a high as your components can manage.

Test Rig

All tests were conducted on the Rig below

Sapphire R9 290 Tri-X
Intel i5 4670k @ 4.6GHz
Gigabyte z87 G1-Sniper
Corsair White Vengeance @ 1600MHz
Cooler master Silent Pro M 1000W
Samsung 830 128GB
Windows 7 x64
AMD Catalyst 14.1 Driver

IMG_02391_zps5d450e1e.jpg


Water cooling Specifications

1x XSPC Raza CPU waterblock (intel i5 4670K @ 4.6GHz @ 1.3v)
1x XSPC Razor R9 290X water block
1x Phobya G-changer 280mm radiator (w/ 2x Aerocool Shark 140mm fans @7v)
1x Hardware Labs Black ICE 120mm radiator (w/ 2x Corsair SP120 fans @12v)
1x Black-Ice GT Stealth 240mm radiator (w/ 2x Corsair SP120mm fans @12v)
1xEK DCP 4.0 pump/reservoir (undervolted)

Performance

I will be rating performance of the Sapphire R9 290 Tri-X agains the overclocked performance using the XSPC R9 290/290X Water block.

Please bear in mind that when comparing this to your reference R9 290 that the Sapphire Tri-X model is not a reference card, with a stock clock speed of 1000MHz and without any thermal throttling due to the non stock cooling solution. Moving from a Reference 290X or 290 should see a larger performance increase as the thermal throttling will be prevented as well as the added overclocking potential adding to performance.


3DMARK

Like any good benchmarking session I will be starting with 3DMARK Vantage, 11 and 3DMARK. All of which benefit greatly from the overclocks, with gains ranging around 10-15% with the exception of Vantage P scores which lesser gains of 7% still is up nearly 2500 points

vantage_zps0c5c8d83.jpg

temps_zps4c7d6af2.jpg


Gaming Benchmarks and Unigine

All gaming benchmarks are are done at the games highest in-game settings (Metro has Psysx off and Rome II is on Extreme Presets) at a resolution of 1440p.

3DMark_zpse25b9c6d.jpg


As we can see here we gain an average of 5 FPS on each game by overclocking, with every game gaining at least 10% extra performance. These gain are impressive and very useful when running at such a high resolution.

Conclusion

With overclocks like these becoming more and more typical with the non-reference R9 290 series but this water block, much like any water block, can give you guy one thing. This thing is what I call the cooling Trifecta.

The Trifecta is when a cooler offers great cooling performance, silence and pleasing aesthetics. The XSPC Razor R9 290/290X water block meets these criteria, provided you have build youself a quiet loop. Looking at these results and even AMD's recently released one thing is for sure, Hawaii was just meant to be surrounded by water.

So what makes the XSPC model stand out compared to other manufacturers? Well from what i see it's visual flexibility, both in the hosing options and aesthetic options. Functionally XSPCs multiport design can allow for some very creative tube routing options as well as the added bling factor provided by the 5 Black Chrome stoppers. Then there is the LEDs which can be switched out to any colour the user desires (With me personally opting for Red lighting) and a brushed aluminium frontplate that could be painted any colour to match your own Rigs theme. Truly XSPC has provided us with some very desirable options which other manufacturers don't.

IMG_02161_zpsf1530ed9.jpg


To finish off, there are impressive gains to be made across the board if you are considering water cooling a reference R9 290, 290X or even an aftermarket card (provided is has a reference PCB ). The thermal headroom provided will eliminate throttling and open up the option to overclock for further performance gains.

If I were able to give this an official award, I'd have to give it gold. Maybe some water blocks will be cheaper but XSPC offer a product which can be the centerpiece of any rig, regardless of your own visual style.

Price - 7/10
Performance - (9/10)
Presentation - (10/10)

If you have any questions, please post below and I will happily give you guys an answer. Thanks for reading.
 
Last edited:
Nice, i've been thinking about watercooling my rig and getting my 290 underwater but i'm not sure yet. Good to see the temps are good underwater even when overclocked. My card can do 1250mhz on the core but performance starts to drop off at ~1200mhz due to heat, i'd like to see how much of a performance increase I get with it watercooled. :)
 
Last edited:
Definitely like how xspc implemented the lighting around the waterblock gives it a very stylish look. I just wish the block for the g1/4 fitting weren't so bulky otherwise I'd have gone for it instead of EK's offerings.

Really interested to know the rest of your watercooling setup as you forgot to add it into your review since it simply moves on to 3dmark scores.

Please bear in mind that when comparing this to your R9 290 Reference that the Sapphire card is not a stock R9 290, with a clock speed of 1000MHz and without the thermal throttling present in the Reference models. Moving from a Reference 290X or 290 should see a larger performance increase as the thermal throttling will be halted as well as the added overclock.

The Rig Used during testing as as follows:

3DMARK

Otherwise a very enjoyable read, fantastic photography (especially studying the g1/4 ports bulk :p ) and overall a well written review.
 
Otherwise a very enjoyable read, fantastic photography (especially studying the g1/4 ports bulk :p ) and overall a well written review.

Cheers man but i'll be honest, some of the photos are from the XSPC website and only some of them are my own. I can't take credit for XSPC's photography.

My rig can be found here in the project logs section;

IMG_02391_zps5d450e1e.jpg


As far as water cooling specs goes, this is what I have;

1x XSPC Raza CPU waterblock (intel i5 4670K @ 4.6GHz @ 1.3v)
1x XSPC Razor R9 290X water block (used in review)
1x Phobya G-changer 280mm radiator
1x Hardware Labs Black ICE 120mm radiator
1x Black-Ice GT Stealth 240mm radiator
1xEK DCP 4.0 pump/reservoir (heavily undervolted, otherwise FAR TOO LOUD)

I'll add my rig specs and watercooling specs to the review now, TBH that was a major oversight on my part.
 
Last edited:
As said above it would help to know the specs of the whole rig. Other than that i am loving the Rome 2 bench results for 1440p.. pretty damn impressive considering how hard that game is to run at max(i love the game hence my interests).
 
As said above it would help to know the specs of the whole rig. Other than that i am loving the Rome 2 bench results for 1440p.. pretty damn impressive considering how hard that game is to run at max(i love the game hence my interests).

Cheers dude, I have added my Rig specs and water cooling specs. It was very silly of me to forget to add them LOL.
 
We all make mistakes sometimes:p

Very nice review. Only wish you had other data to throw in there but I suppose it is not needed for a waterblock review.
 
Last edited:
Cheers guys.

NeverBackDown, what data would you want added? If you want a game benchmark or two I might be able to do that.

Well i meant compared to other cards that were watercooled as well. Though if you do feel like adding more results then by all means go for it but i don't think its absolutely necessary.
 
Well i meant compared to other cards that were watercooled as well. Though if you do feel like adding more results then by all means go for it but i don't think its absolutely necessary.

Aye it would be great to see a water block roundup or something like that, but sadly not many people have the time or hardware to do that kind of testing. It would be good to know which brand comes out on top, or if they would perform any differently at all.
 
Am I the only one that doesn't like the look of the XSPC blocks since they moved to the Raystorm style?
I think it annoys me that the actual cooling block is basically the same as before, just with a huge bit of acrylic stuck on it.

Also, what were the VRM temps like? I thought that XSPC used to be pretty bad with VRM temps on the AMD blocks?
 
Aye it would be great to see a water block roundup or something like that, but sadly not many people have the time or hardware to do that kind of testing. It would be good to know which brand comes out on top, or if they would perform any differently at all.

True but we can wish can't we?

Am I the only one that doesn't like the look of the XSPC blocks since they moved to the Raystorm style?
I think it annoys me that the actual cooling block is basically the same as before, just with a huge bit of acrylic stuck on it.

Also, what were the VRM temps like? I thought that XSPC used to be pretty bad with VRM temps on the AMD blocks?

I would like to know about the VRM as well. I was planning on upgrading maybe this summer to a full loop with possibly a 290x.
 
Also, what were the VRM temps like? I thought that XSPC used to be pretty bad with VRM temps on the AMD blocks?

I don't have any numbers for that at present because my sapphire card was unwilling to let me record them.

That being said XSPC has moved to an "active VRM cooling solution", which means that unlike their previous designs the VRMs have water/coolant flowing directly over them, so VRM temperatures should no longer be an issue for XSPC blocks.

They have also decreased the fin with by 50% from 1mm to 0.5mm, which significantly increases the area for heat to dissipate.

I wouldn't say that XSPC are not changing their designs mate, there are always small iterative refinements that are made which easily go unnoticed.

290x-1.jpg

r290x-6.jpg
 
Last edited:
great review! Is there any chance that we can see a regular 780 XSPC waterblock review as well?

No there won't, This review is of hardware I purchased for my own rig.

The only way I'd be able to review more blocks is if i bought them myself, not exactly feasible lol. I'll consider your request as a compliment, so cheers.

It would be nice to see more water-cooling stuff from OC3D though.
 
Back
Top