Viewsonic VX922

[shiftlocked]

ANyone heard of these monitors. Aparantly supposed to be about 1ms resonse time and such. NOt been able to find many reviews on it.

 

[FragTek]

I would imagine that 1s response to approximately 8-10ms in actuallity with the red-green transfer time factored in. Never buy a monitor based on the manufacturers posted response time, because it's a big fat lie (somewhat...). Also keep in mind that the faster the response time means the less clear the onscreen image, so u do sacrifice clarity for speed. What you really want is a good mid-range response monitor with equally as good image quality. Anything sub 12ms (some would argue even 16ms) is going to be as low as you will ever need for gaming purposes.

 

[Raven]

Anything sub 12ms (some would argue even 16ms) is going to be as low as you will ever need for gaming purposes.

depends alittle on refresh rate but when using 60hz 16ms response time is enough as 60hz translate to 16.6ms for each update.

75hz is equal to 13.3ms.

i have the vx924 with 3ms response time and have mostly good to say about that one however i can se its not perfect on the colours when switching windows in windows but in games it looks good and is very easy to configure when using dvi and the image is sharp and nice.

 

[WC Annihilus]

Hmm, you should look at their website man. Supposedly 2ms gray-gray (avg) and 2ms white-black-white (typ) response times.

Link: http://www.viewsonic.com/products/desktopdisplays/lcddisplays/xseries/vx922/#specs

 

[noveltylamp]

If you were looking for this information then I can inform you the VX922 has a good diffusion layer which does not make the screen look mucky like many tfts are fitted with, strangely though i've seen other model Viewsonics with those horrible bog standard mucky diffusion layers so it isn't standard accross the model range.

Why do reviews never look at the diffusion layer?

 

[FragTek]

Probably because they don't want you to know the truth hehe