Should guns be banned in America?

Calico

New member
Hey,

Got into this discussion on another board, wanted to get some more views on the topic.

Should guns be banned in the USA?

How many of you own a gun?

What do citizens need them for?

My view is that less ppl would be dying from gun crime if they were illegal. Thats a logical and reasonable assumption to make imo. To get some data (its from wiki but ive checked it against another source(Here).. the figures correlate well).

Here are some death rates given as > death-rate per 100,000 population in one year.

USA

Total firearm-related death rate: 10.2

Homicides: 7.07

Suicides: 7.35

Unintentional deaths: 0.59

UK

Total firearm-related death rate: 0.46

Homicides: 0.07

Suicides: 0.03

Unintentional deaths: 0.01

Now from that... the ACCIDENTAL gun death in america is HIGHER than the total gun related death in the uk And generally all figures are SIGNIFICANTLY lower.

So to me it is as simple as saying guns bring death... and should be banned.

What are your views?
 
Right to bare arms is all i got to say. What people do with or without guns is their own doing. Yes maybe it would help... But you will never sway the big chunk of america that would go to war just to have their pistol at their side. Rather stay away from it... Its like bringing up abortion in the middle of a debate... Just grounds you dont go towards. But i do see what you are getting at... But picking apart those numbers, what percent is a person defending his/her property or family. What percentage is drug alcohol related. Guns do not kill people... People kill people... End of story... Now i do not own a single gun but i know people who do. And i would like them to have the right to own a defensive tool. It has been in our constitution and it will stay.

ALSO what most people do not look at is the fact that people can kill with anything... Hell i could come accrossed your face with a kick while you were looking bust your temple and call it a day. I could grab my fork and stab you a couple times... ANYTHING in your household i would say a good 30%+ can be used as a simple deadly weapon... If you ban guns you should just start to make everything plastic and blunt...

Also even though those numbers are per 100 thousand. You have to also bring into the fact of how many people are packed into a single area.. How many slums or (Gang banging) areas are in America. Im sure if we could get our country under control from the Mexican cartel and the predominantly black gangs, things would drop a good chunk.

My point is, GUNS DO NOT KILL PEOPLE. Go ahead lay one on the table and wait for it to kill somebody. Youll be there for awhile... People kill people simple as that.
 
kinda biased there in the comparison you only selected 2 countries from the 20-30+ on the list. US is ranked 8th on the list I found with a quick Google search. And it says for 2004 while the rate for the UK isn't dated. So true-fully its not a proper comparison. You'd have to show real-time data for the same time frame to compare properly. But to the topic at hand. I doubt very seriously banning guns would solve anything. Look at illegal drugs they are pretty much banned but they still get them so it would be the same for guns. Outlaw them just makes ppl want them more. Anywho just my 2p's
 
kinda biased there in the comparison you only selected 2 countries from the 20-30+ on the list. US is ranked 8th on the list I found with a quick Google search. And it says for 2004 while the rate for the UK isn't dated. So true-fully its not a proper comparison. You'd have to show real-time data for the same time frame to compare properly. But to the topic at hand. I doubt very seriously banning guns would solve anything. Look at illegal drugs they are pretty much banned but they still get them so it would be the same for guns. Outlaw them just makes ppl want them more. Anywho just my 2p's

Very valid points.
 
Them being banned wont stop people who want them getting them, thats a fact, personally i think as long as you dont have a criminal record for violence/robbery/gang related stuff you should be aloud to own a firearm, If more people owned fire arms it would cut down on the amount of robberies/muggings just cause it raises the stakes for the person committing the offense (some states that have relaxed there fire arms laws in the past few years have actually seen a reduction of nearly all crime), getting caught and doing jail time for robbery is a damn sight less of a risk than the risk of being killed by the person your trying to steal from.

A few things come to mind as to why you should be aloud if you so wish are the rampages that went on in the "gun free zones" in the US in the past, of the ones i remember seeing/reading about on/in the news none of the people that did them had a fire arms license/permit or what ever yet they still got hold of automatic weapons, if it had been in a non "gun free zone" im pretty sure someone would have at least attempted to stop them before so many innocent people where pointlessly killed.

If you took out the suicide, unintentional and total statistics and just looked at the homicides, if that included homicides including stabbings/blunt objects/beatings they would probably be pretty similar, if you want to kill someone it ISN'T hard, nothing stops you walking up to/past someone and shooting them, the same as nothing stops you walking up to someone and stabbing them/hitting them with a bat or what ever else, most people are smart enough to just not do it.

Basically my view is people should have the right to own a fire arm/concealed weapon if they wish as long as they haven't got a criminal conviction for violence/robbery/gang related stuff.
 
So you've read the bill of rights yay, so I guess you're also part of a well regulated militia... oh that's right, let's have selective amnesia about that shall we.
 
Hey,

Got into this discussion on another board, wanted to get some more views on the topic.

Should guns be banned in the USA?

How many of you own a gun?

What do citizens need them for?

My view is that less ppl would be dying from gun crime if they were illegal. Thats a logical and reasonable assumption to make imo. To get some data (its from wiki but ive checked it against another source(Here).. the figures correlate well).

Here are some death rates given as > death-rate per 100,000 population in one year.

USA

Total firearm-related death rate: 10.2

Homicides: 7.07

Suicides: 7.35

Unintentional deaths: 0.59

UK

Total firearm-related death rate: 0.46

Homicides: 0.07

Suicides: 0.03

Unintentional deaths: 0.01

Now from that... the ACCIDENTAL gun death in america is HIGHER than the total gun related death in the uk And generally all figures are SIGNIFICANTLY lower.

So to me it is as simple as saying guns bring death... and should be banned.

What are your views?

America vs UK or EU is comparing apples to oranges.

The fact is, there have been places here in the US where they tried gun free zones, Every time it is tried the crime rate and homicides go way up. Washington DC is a prime example of this fact.

When you outlaw guns, only the criminals have the guns, and they know it.

I can give you countless examples of People saving themselves every day with a personal fire arm. My Neighbor is one of them. His X-wife decided to hire a couple Hispanic gang members to go to his house and off him. This was a few years back. They came to his house in the middle of the night, 2 thugs, one with a pistol and the other with a gas can. They attempted to sneak into his house through a window. He heard something, grabbed his Shot gun and went to the living room, The One with the gun was halfway into his window, He shot that one and they both turned tail and ran down his driveway to a waiting car. The found the one he shot later that night on the side of the road where his buddies dumped him after he died.

They were going to kill him and burn his house down around him, Good thing he had a gun. Heck even if the thugs did no have a gun, what is he going to do against 2 guys.

This is just one case. There are thousands and thousands of people still alive today thanks to personal fire arms.

I would highly recomend checking out this siteThe Armed Citizen and looking at some other examples that are updated constantly with the stories you will not hear in the news. For every homicide with a gun you hear about on the news, they will not tell you about the dozen of incidents of people saving themselves/family with a personal fire arm in the time between that homicide report and the last.

Then there is the fact that we here in the US have the 2nd amendment, the right to bear arms and that right may not be infringed, Its the 2nd, not the 5th, 10th its #2 right up there at the top. It was not given to us so we could hunt, or go off for target practice. It was put in the constitution as a means to protect the people from their own government. Remember a little thing called the American Revolution? Do you think there would be a United States of America today if the People did not have the right to bare arms?

Once you start taking away a right such as our 2nd, then why not the freedom of speech? After all you can offend someone with your words, or cause a fight by your words. Just think how different Iran would be right now if those people that marched in the streets to stand up to the government had the right to bear arms? Instead the got mowed down with stones in their hands.

Your numbers only show the number of gun injuries in the UK, Well in a place it is hard to get a gun I would expect nothing less, but you do not show that by taking the guns from the people that overall violence has gone down.

Washington DC has the highest murder rate in the United States last time I checked, And it is a GUN BAN Zone. Criminals will always get guns, or work in numbers. Banning guns just takes away the ability for a law abiding citizen to even the odds against an attacker and turns him/her into a victim. And law abiding citizens without guns just creates a safe work environment for the Criminal.

You mention that if guns were banned than murders by guns would go down, This is probably true, but Murders overall would go way up. Lets say that banning guns would magically make all guns on earth disappear. Ok, Lets say your mother or wife is home alone with the kids and a couple thugs attempt to break into the house. Your wife/mother might have time to get to a phone and call the cops, but how long before they get there? Now would you rather this happen in a world with no guns, if they get in how is your wife going to protect herself and the kids?, do these guys have a Knife?, Do they need one? Are you going to trust the safety of your family to a can of pepper spray? A tazer that may or may not stop one of the bad guys?

I would rather she have access to a fire arm, at least with a fire arm she is on even ground and has a chance. Did I mention here in California they are about to release 40,000 inmates out onto the street due to over crowding? Ya, Ill hang on to my guns.

Fun fact, did you know police have no legal obligation to protect you? There was a case where a man was stabbing his wife to death in the middle of the street while a police officer on the scene just watched in shock while this guy was standing over his wife stabbing the heck out of her.

I have several friends in law enforcement and they all recommend people have personal fire arms for self defense.

There was plenty of Murder going on long before the first gun was ever manufactured. As far as gun accidents, that is "Extreamly" rare to be a case of a faulty gun, it is due to carelessnes. Idiots not following safety rules, Not securing their weapons properly ect..

I would bet there are a lot more accidental deaths in swimming pools than from guns, And I bet the UK has a much higher murder rate from the use of Knives than we do in the US. But thats just a guess.
 
Im not going to go into a long post here as i am pro gun.

The simple fact is tighter gun laws don't always mean less gun crime.

Ireland has a FAR stricter set of firearms laws then that of the UK and still we have a higher % of gun related homicides.

In 2008 Ireland had 38.2% of murders and manslaughters involve firearms where as England and whales had 6.8%.

These are facts taken from Liz Campbell's paper "Responding to Gun Crime in Ireland" published in the British Journal of Criminology.
 
Right to bare arms is all i got to say.

Is mostly what people quote. The right to bare arms was so there could never be a time where the likes of the british could tyranically retake the colony. As to allow the mobilising of a local militia in such an even.

These rights get ammended so many times tho. And in the dawning of the expansion westwards of american settlements it was practical to make it more and more allowable.

It's noticeable that after the civil war, the defeated confederacy, upon surrendering (and swearing allegence) would have to give up their arms. Again, understandable.

It's hard to change a way of life tho. Once hundreds of millions of people have arms across the states, how in the heck can you get rid of them ?

As to the question, should they be banned ? Way back at the dawning of the states, it would have been foolish, and most likely remained a british colony. Today, it sounds good to say yes, but it's just impractical.

You can't just own a gun btw. There are rules and regulations to the "right", and they certainly no longer pertain to the orginal right which would be to mobolise a militia in the event of a tyranical regime.
 
kinda biased there in the comparison you only selected 2 countries from the 20-30+ on the list. US is ranked 8th on the list I found with a quick Google search. And it says for 2004 while the rate for the UK isn't dated. So true-fully its not a proper comparison. You'd have to show real-time data for the same time frame to compare properly. But to the topic at hand. I doubt very seriously banning guns would solve anything. Look at illegal drugs they are pretty much banned but they still get them so it would be the same for guns. Outlaw them just makes ppl want them more. Anywho just my 2p's

Well i wouldnt say biased. I specifically picked those two countries so i could get the views from citizens of those countries (i would say this forum has more UK and USA members than other countries). They would be better placed to comment on the debate, dont you think? I doubt there are many columbians on the forum to add their 2 cents about why the death rate in their country is so high
wink.gif


True, its not a perfect comparison. BUT if you did find a comparable year im sure the results would be similar i.e. USA gun crime would be much higher. In fact heres some data for you:

http://i259.photobucket.com/albums/hh288/krispos42/DU/USvsUKhomiciderates.jpg

So comparing similar years...didnt change the results much and we can still draw the same conclusions, no?

In regard to your last point. Gun control is not a overall solution to gun crime, it is just attempting to reduce it and prevent unnecessary death. Valid point about drugs. Yes people still get them.. but if drugs were legal... FAR MORE people would have them. Look at amsterdam... theres a coffee shop on every corner. Even they are looking to ban coffee shops... which will inevitably result in a drop in drug consumption because they are harder to obtain. The same prinicple can be applied to guns.

Right to bare arms is all i got to say. What people do with or without guns is their own doing. Yes maybe it would help... But you will never sway the big chunk of america that would go to war just to have their pistol at their side. Rather stay away from it... Its like bringing up abortion in the middle of a debate... Just grounds you dont go towards. But i do see what you are getting at... But picking apart those numbers, what percent is a person defending his/her property or family. What percentage is drug alcohol related. Guns do not kill people... People kill people... End of story... Now i do not own a single gun but i know people who do. And i would like them to have the right to own a defensive tool. It has been in our constitution and it will stay.

ALSO what most people do not look at is the fact that people can kill with anything... Hell i could come accrossed your face with a kick while you were looking bust your temple and call it a day. I could grab my fork and stab you a couple times... ANYTHING in your household i would say a good 30%+ can be used as a simple deadly weapon... If you ban guns you should just start to make everything plastic and blunt...

Also even though those numbers are per 100 thousand. You have to also bring into the fact of how many people are packed into a single area.. How many slums or (Gang banging) areas are in America. Im sure if we could get our country under control from the Mexican cartel and the predominantly black gangs, things would drop a good chunk.

My point is, GUNS DO NOT KILL PEOPLE. Go ahead lay one on the table and wait for it to kill somebody. Youll be there for awhile... People kill people simple as that.

"guns dont kill people.. people kill people". That is true. BUT guns offer a quick and "easy" medium to kill someone. It takes a second.. bang.. and someone is dead. Yeah, you could take a fork and REPEATEDLY stab someone to death. Or take a hammer and bludgeon someone to death. BUT im guessing psychologically thats a hell of a lot harder to go through than pulling a trigger. Imo people would be less inclined to commit a murder via the more brutal method.

However, the above example is just looking at killing a single person. Guns also increase the RATE at which you can kill people. Look at the virginia tech incident. All those kids died because the guy could pull a trigger and people were dropping dead seconds after one another. It would take him a while to go and kill all those kids with a fork dont you think? So if he hadnt had a gun.. a LOT of childrens lives would have been saved imo.

You said, you dont know what part of the gun rate is from drug/alcohol etc. Fair point, but guns make it easier to kill. And my overall point is that... take guns out of the equation and less people will die. Does any1 one have some data or points to contradict that?

Im not going to go into a long post here as i am pro gun.

The simple fact is tighter gun laws don't always mean less gun crime.

Ireland has a FAR stricter set of firearms laws then that of the UK and still we have a higher % of gun related homicides.

In 2008 Ireland had 38.2% of murders and manslaughters involve firearms where as England and whales had 6.8%.

These are facts taken from Liz Campbell's paper "Responding to Gun Crime in Ireland" published in the British Journal of Criminology.

Well you cant look at percentages when the size of country is different. Consider this. You have two bottles. One can hold 500ml of water and the other 1000ml of water. Now put 250ml of water in both. The first would have 50% water.. and the other would have 25% water. Even thought its the same amount. So thats why you have to look at the water RATE. its more representative of the data.

Note: I will reply to the other messages, after lunch
tongue.gif
keep the debate going.. its an interesting topic imo
smile.gif
 
Back
Top