Whatever legs Vega had to stand on, they're gone.
Even a GTX 1070Ti with an overclock could beat a Vega 64 in games like GTA V and PUBG, two of the biggest games being played right now. I want to laugh, but I also want to cry. I better laugh, just in case. xD
I'm still not regretting buying a Vega 56. If nothing else it means I haven't supported a business that is severely anti-competitor.
Don't get me wrong, competition is necessary for business but this wasn't competition; Nvidia have the fastest consumer card on the planet in their product stack, have a massive mind-share and install base lead over AMD and even with Vega 56 being competitive in performance it was at a higher power draw.
Nvidia had no reason to do this other than wanting to drive AMD out of the market completely, which in my mind is just as bad as being anti-consumer. They could have just let AMD have the Vega 56 for a few months before dropping Volta and still made a massive profit and maintained their market position.
I'm still not regretting buying a Vega 56. If nothing else it means I haven't supported a business that is severely anti-competitor.
Don't get me wrong, competition is necessary for business but this wasn't competition; Nvidia have the fastest consumer card on the planet in their product stack, have a massive mind-share and install base lead over AMD and even with Vega 56 being competitive in performance it was at a higher power draw.
Nvidia had no reason to do this other than wanting to drive AMD out of the market completely, which in my mind is just as bad as being anti-consumer. They could have just let AMD have the Vega 56 for a few months before dropping Volta and still made a massive profit and maintained their market position.
I'm still not regretting buying a Vega 56. If nothing else it means I haven't supported a business that is severely anti-competitor.
Don't get me wrong, competition is necessary for business but this wasn't competition; Nvidia have the fastest consumer card on the planet in their product stack, have a massive mind-share and install base lead over AMD and even with Vega 56 being competitive in performance it was at a higher power draw.
Nvidia had no reason to do this other than wanting to drive AMD out of the market completely, which in my mind is just as bad as being anti-consumer. They could have just let AMD have the Vega 56 for a few months before dropping Volta and still made a massive profit and maintained their market position.
TBH the way I have always seen it is that you (used to) get far more for your money with AMD. Not comparable performance. And I mean comparable as in not even as fast for the same money these days.
With Nvidia you are paying for pedigree. You are also paying for the many millions they sink into R&D. With AMD they don't put in anywhere near as much as Nvidia but over the past couple of years want the same out. And that is why I have not bought from AMD since the Fury X.
And I won't all of the time they waste "my" money (money I paid to them for their product and future products) on turkeys and not what I want.
AMD should go back to what they are good at.
As for Nvidia being anti consumer? what do you make of the Vega debacle then? lying to your customers, hiding things from your customers and deliberately trying to fool them with stupid tactics of "Well derpy derp it feels the same as a 1080ti !"
At least Nvidia deliver where it matters.
As for the Strix? I heard Asus recalled it from a couple of reviewers because the bios was messed up. So I wouldn't call on that just yet.
TBH mate I don't really need to justify what I do. I do it for me, that's what counts. I couldn't really care one jot about what some one on the net thinks of me
Same goes for any one, do what is right for you![]()
Now if only more of the PC gaming community could take this approach rather than constantly hating on people who bought "from the enemy".
As always it's been a pleasure Alien.