PowerColor Vega 64 Red Devil Review

So, more expensive, slower, uses more power and runs hotter than a 1080.

Yeah, I can really see the appeal of wanting to buy one of these.:rolleyes:
 
It's beautiful though. *sigh*. Such a shame PC suck at everything but making their cards desirable. The RX 480 should have been much better than it was, too.
 
It's beautiful though. *sigh*. Such a shame PC suck at everything but making their cards desirable. The RX 480 should have been much better than it was, too.

Theres nothing 'wrong' with this card. The limitations always are the core....
 
Ah OK. Was just going on the comment above. The 480 one was pants though. Sapphire was much better at clocking etc. Still preferred the Devil for looks though :)

The 480 caught them off guard and the cooler they had for it wasnt up to the task and then they turned the power down to a level the cooler could cope with and then that mean it performed pants.

This is a cracking card but any issues are just down to the fact its Vega sadly
 
So, more expensive, slower, uses more power and runs hotter than a 1080.

Yeah, I can really see the appeal of wanting to buy one of these.:rolleyes:

If you are intrested in variable refreshrate monitors you can easily find a good Freesync monitor, and that will let you actually spend less in total than going with a 1080 and a Gsync monitor.
 
Although these coolers look nice, Vega needs water to shine, I've seen a V64 get close to 9000 GPU score on the new Futuremark Cyan VR benchmark compared to the same card getting 7700 on air.
 
Thanks for the review

Thanks for the review!

I am not clear on how you did the OC though. Did you undervolt it?

I did read the text as well as looking at the graphs, maybe I am not reading well at 1:30 AM :D
 
Seeing as they made the XB1X with 40 polaris CUs, what was stopping them releasing bigger cards than the 480/580?
Im tempted to think a polaris card with 64 CUs would have been better than V64, if not it would have atleast been a bit more efficient/less ridiculous.
 
Vega seems perfectly capable of being a lot more efficient than it is in most reviews. My 56 outperforms this 64 whilst running with 1075mV instead of 1200mV and still managing to push between 1640 and 1680MHz.

Ironically, running it balls to the wall not caring about power consumption, I can only get it up to around 1710MHz, but I probably need more than +50% power target.
 
Seeing as they made the XB1X with 40 polaris CUs, what was stopping them releasing bigger cards than the 480/580?
Im tempted to think a polaris card with 64 CUs would have been better than V64, if not it would have atleast been a bit more efficient/less ridiculous.

It's a custom chip. They could have done 64 CUs. It's not the same as Polaris but bigger.
 
I've always been a fan of the Red Devil cards. Looks like this one is pretty solid as well other than the power draw which is AMD's fault, not Power Color's. Generally I could live with a high power draw but man, 619 watts is a whopping amount! I thought my 290x was a monster pulling 400 watts from the wall. 619 would be a little hard to live with.
 
I have had a power color in the past. Not to fussed to be honest. Not a very reliable brand.
Did the job for my for cheapest in the past (had a HD 4650). but I wouldn't got back to them again.
If your looking for a cheap brand go for it. Never know, they might have become more reliable over the years :)
 
I just got one of these for a really good price, so I'm going around reading the reviews on it.

It is a fine looking GPU and I think that it will be a decent gamer too.
I do have an all-red LED PC that it will look good in.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top