Seem's legit, Just like a virus being able to switch off the lights.
It's a lie to block, block, block and spy, spy, spy nothing more. If anything does come of it, False flag.
Tbh, this does look pretty legit. If it's a hoax, it's a rather elaborate one.
And ask yourself this: If it is a hoax, can we afford to not at least investigate
further and see if there is not some truth to it?
I'm certainly not about to go panic about flying (and I do think that the media
have a tendency to panic when there's no cause to do so a lot of the time),
but in the long-term this probably should be looked into.
I'm surprised that all that data is unencrypted and anyone with the right tools can read/modify it.
It just shows that these systems, along with the majority of the infrastructure,
are decades old, and encrypting that stuff just wasn't necessary back then.
And since the only thing that counts is the bottom line (some would argue
that the lives lost in possible accidents matter as well, but the only reason
those lives matter
to the plane's manufacturer is because bad reputation
will hurt profits IMHO), and adding additional security measures is expensive,
you don't implement that if you are the manufacturer unless you absolutely
have to.
Care to share some of those stories?

Can't say that I've heard many of them
Well, it's a bit tricky because there's no clear narrative. It's more like little tid-bits
here and there.
Mostly it's not necessarily about something going wrong but something being
implemented in such a way that usability suffers. So in order to get the plane
to do what you want it to do, you have to do some non-intuitive work-around.
Then there's stuff like screens suddenly going blank (you know, the ones that
display flight data

), switches not working properly and so on.
Also, they need to use some sort of special software to calculate how much
fuel the need to tank and at what thrust levels they need to take off (since
that depends on winds, temperature, humidity, weight). That software doesn't
run on the airplane itself but on a laptop. It's made by Airbus and seems to be
an absolute usability nightmare. To paraphrase his opinion:
"The interface of Windows 3.11 looks beautiful and is a dream of usability
compared to this shit.".
Considering that a plane is such an immensely complex system and that profit
margins in the airline business are very low (meaning passengers are cheap little
shits that don't want to pay any money for something that should be a lot
more expensive than it actually is :lol: ), it's not really astonishing.
But definitely discomforting, at least to me
