OC3D css zombie server

C

Chicken Sh1t

New member
Hi,

didn't really know who to contact... anyway, members are using the "voteban" command to ban human zombies, i think this is unfair and forces players to swap team in hope not to get banned...

can you please remove the voteban/votekick feature as everyone is abusing it.

regards

:)
 
i think zombie servers are generally themes as humans vs zombies, and the idea is that everybody stays on CT side. Personally I think this is better, and if a lot of people are vote kicking, maybe they think so aswell?
 
name='Dav0s' said:
i think zombie servers are generally themes as humans vs zombies, and the idea is that everybody stays on CT side. Personally I think this is better, and if a lot of people are vote kicking, maybe they think so aswell?
Click to expand...

I don't agree as it is fun being a zombie, having your minions follow you around :D

Most of the time CT just use map glitches to defeat the stupid bots :rolleyes:. Sometimes it's good to have a human lead the zombies and also attack where they do not expect...
 
Ya, I hate humans who just sit and camp, so I just go on the zombie side and put a stop to that :D Definately makes things much more interesting ;)
 
Votekick/Voteban was only recently introduced as the Zombie server is very popular and cannot always be manned by an admin.

Therefore i'm reluctant to remove it, as this would prevent people from kicking abusive players, team flashers....etc

However, at present it only requires 60% of players to vote on a kick/ban - maybe it would be more reasonable if this was increased to 70%?
 
XMS said:
Votekick/Voteban was only recently introduced as the Zombie server is very popular and cannot always be manned by an admin.

Therefore i'm reluctant to remove it, as this would prevent people from kicking abusive players, team flashers....etc

However, at present it only requires 60% of players to vote on a kick/ban - maybe it would be more reasonable if this was increased to 70%?
Click to expand...

70 possibly even 80.... If someone is hacking or doing some truely bad **** 70-80% vote shouldnt be hard to achieve.
 
name='FragTek' said:
70 possibly even 80.... If someone is hacking or doing some truely bad **** 70-80% vote shouldnt be hard to achieve.
Click to expand...

doing what frag said on all servers would be good:)

hopefully i will be able to join you guys soon,after these corsair replacements turn up :yumyum:

cheers.
 
I just went onto the zombie server as I was downloading and ping wasnt great :rolleyes:

What was happening the whole time was - humans were just joining the zombies. Some were zombie every round and a lot of the time it was 20 zombies (humans+bots) against 10 CT's. I was checking a lot and the server was full a lot of the time so no new players can join. I was kicking the bot zombies to make room and trying to force the humans to CT. Took a lot of work and they just did 'retry' in console and joined zombies again.

The only way CT had a chance was to use map glitches which sucks, and they still lost. There is a need for some balance of some sort, or dont let the humans re-generate so fast because it was nutz. I was catching a few of them with the awp which they didnt like :p!

If people are being 'votebanned' rather than 'votekicked' I think that is unfair. 80% of people to make a successful vote would be tough as a lot of the players are zombies anway!!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
FAO: OC3D Clan Members
Replies
4
Views
1K
Tom^
T
Back
Top