Nvidia's G-Sync HDR 4K 144Hz monitors reportedly use Blurry Chroma Subsampling at ove

Which gives you a premium piece of junk. I still can't stop scratching my head about that fan located in the back of the Acer monitor. Someone thought that was an awesome idea apparently...
4k144 is completely useless anyways, so it was alrready designed as a piece of junk.

So we should avoid these monitors. But should we avoid DP 1.4 in general, because of DSC and its lag?
 
4k144 is completely useless anyways, so it was alrready designed as a piece of junk.

So we should avoid these monitors. But should we avoid DP 1.4 in general, because of DSC and its lag?

Oh? I haven't even read anything about that. What's that all about?
 
I've been saying this since the monitors were announce.. DP 1.4 can only handle 120Hz at UHD, so ery is needed to go above 120Hz.

Why th eneed to go striaght for 144Hz, 120 would be awesome as a fist release, probably easier for them too!
 
Not interested in 4K, Although it will be stupid expensive I'm looking forward to 3440x1440 200Hz HDR 512 individual light zones with G-Sync and Quantum Dot tech from Acer and Asus.
 
I've been saying this since the monitors were announce.. DP 1.4 can only handle 120Hz at UHD, so ery is needed to go above 120Hz.

Why th eneed to go striaght for 144Hz, 120 would be awesome as a fist release, probably easier for them too!

Because the population are whiny little spoiled brats. release a £2k monitor @ 120hz and everyone will laugh saying "it only goes to 120 when my IPS can do 165hz" etc etc.
 
Because the population are whiny little spoiled brats. release a £2k monitor @ 120hz and everyone will laugh saying "it only goes to 120 when my IPS can do 165hz" etc etc.

Definitely agree. I feel like ASUS and ACER and all those guys see how spoilt rotten people are, how they expect so much; and are giving it to them despite making compromises that are kind of unacceptable (to me) at this price point.
 
Back
Top