Nvidia announce Pascal Powered GTX Titan X

Excalabur50 said:
Sounds like a beast but the one I waiting to here about is the 1080Ti
Click to expand...

I don't think its going to be much cheaper than this Titan X, I expected this Titan to come in at $1400 with the Ti to come at the previous Titan price of $900 I would still wager that's still a pretty good estimate now that we know this gen's titan is more expensive
 
12% less clock speed is not really "much lower".

It hardly seems relevant compared to the massive increase in cores.

So nice to see they follow the usual pattern. 1080ti just got one step closer.:)
 
This could be NVidia's worst card for quite a while.

Look at the specs they are not good.

Low clocks

A small increase in cores over the 1080

Probably not a full fat chip

TDP around 300 watts

This could be a hot running card with performance barely better than a non reference 1080.
 
Kaapstad said:
This could be NVidia's worst card for quite a while.

Look at the specs they are not good.

Low clocks

A small increase in cores over the 1080

Probably not a full fat chip

TDP around 300 watts

This could be a hot running card with performance barely better than a non reference 1080.
Click to expand...

I agree, in hindsight the Titan X wasnt a bad buy at $900 considering it was the fastest card for almost 2 years and with all the async compute/vulkan/dx12 performance still not making a real improvement in the Nvidia cards I wouldnt make the investment in this gen unless I was on something older then maxwell and even then I would try hold off from buying in it just feels like this generations release from Nvidia wont have the legs the Maxwell gen had.
 
Kaapstad said:
This could be NVidia's worst card for quite a while.

Look at the specs they are not good.

Low clocks

A small increase in cores over the 1080

Probably not a full fat chip

TDP around 300 watts

This could be a hot running card with performance barely better than a non reference 1080.
Click to expand...

Ok I just have to say this.
Low clocks - last Titan X was running ~1GHz this is 1.4GHz+
A small increase in cores over the 1080 - you think 1000 cores more is a "small increase"?
Probably not a full fat chip - it is indeed not a full fat chip the full GP100 has around 300 more cores
TDP around 300 watts - well... what did you expect? 150W?
And finally "performance barely better than a non reference 1080" hmm.. 11TF versus 9TF I'd say it's considerably better.

Just to clarify I'm neither an AMD nor Nvidia fan I just hate it when someone feels the need to criticize on hollow grounds.
 
hdimitrov said:
Ok I just have to say this.
Low clocks - last Titan X was running ~1GHz this is 1.4GHz+
A small increase in cores over the 1080 - you think 1000 cores more is a "small increase"?
Probably not a full fat chip - it is indeed not a full fat chip the full GP100 has around 300 more cores
TDP around 300 watts - well... what did you expect? 150W?
And finally "performance barely better than a non reference 1080" hmm.. 11TF versus 9TF I'd say it's considerably better.

Just to clarify I'm neither an AMD nor Nvidia fan I just hate it when someone feels the need to criticize on hollow grounds.
Click to expand...

You just made my argument for me.:D

Now overclock both the stock 1080 and Pascal Titan and that gap in TF will narrow quite a bit.

Remember when overclocking the Pascal Titan it already has a TDP of 300 watts and will most likely throttle bad.
 
Kaapstad said:
This could be NVidia's worst card for quite a while.

Look at the specs they are not good.

Low clocks

A small increase in cores over the 1080

Probably not a full fat chip

TDP around 300 watts

This could be a hot running card with performance barely better than a non reference 1080.
Click to expand...

Titans were never exactly great value for money.

hdimitrov said:
Ok I just have to say this.
Low clocks - last Titan X was running ~1GHz this is 1.4GHz+
A small increase in cores over the 1080 - you think 1000 cores more is a "small increase"?
Probably not a full fat chip - it is indeed not a full fat chip the full GP100 has around 300 more cores
TDP around 300 watts - well... what did you expect? 150W?
And finally "performance barely better than a non reference 1080" hmm.. 11TF versus 9TF I'd say it's considerably better.

Just to clarify I'm neither an AMD nor Nvidia fan I just hate it when someone feels the need to criticize on hollow grounds.
Click to expand...

The clocks of the old Titan don't matter one bit, this is a new architecture and the 1080 runs 200mhz higher on core and memory. It costs nearly twice as much as a 1080 and it will be nowhere near twice the performance, probably like ~25% over a FE 1080. 250W wouldn't be as efficient as the 1080 either, it should be in the realm of 220W.
I'm also fairly sure Kaapstad isn't the type of person to bash nvidia on hollow grounds, the guy owns 4 Titan X.
 
SeekaX said:
Titans were never exactly great value for money.



The clocks of the old Titan don't matter one bit, this is a new architecture and the 1080 runs 200mhz higher on core and memory. It costs nearly twice as much as a 1080 and it will be nowhere near twice the performance, probably like ~25% over a FE 1080. 250W wouldn't be as efficient as the 1080 either, it should be in the realm of 220W.
I'm also fairly sure Kaapstad isn't the type of person to bash nvidia on hollow grounds, the guy owns 4 Titan X.
Click to expand...

I have got a 1060 too.:D

NkoNfD8.jpg


An absolute beast of an overclocker too. It did 2152/2400 on the Time Spy bench.:D

I will be getting the new Pascal Titan to try out but I can not defend the negative side to using them.:)
 
Kaapstad said:
I will be getting the new Pascal Titan to try out but I can not defend the negative side to using them.:)
Click to expand...

Not if this is correct you won't.

http://www.guru3d.com/news-story/nvidia-announces-geforce-gtx-titan-x-based-on-gp102-has-gddr5x.html

I refer to - The product is expected to launch August two and will only available from selected system builders.

I would assume that means people like Alienware, Origin, Falcon NW etc.

Ed. Right at the bottom of the article it says from Nvidia.com too, so you may get one.
 
@Kaapstad point proven. I agree I did not take into account the overclockability and thermal throttling. Sorry if I sounded rude but I haven't entirely woken up yet and did not take all details into consideration. No hard feelings :)
 
AlienALX said:
Not if this is correct you won't.

http://www.guru3d.com/news-story/nvidia-announces-geforce-gtx-titan-x-based-on-gp102-has-gddr5x.html

I refer to - The product is expected to launch August two and will only available from selected system builders.

I would assume that means people like Alienware, Origin, Falcon NW etc.

Ed. Right at the bottom of the article it says from Nvidia.com too, so you may get one.
Click to expand...

I suspect it will also say on the NVidia site "Limit 2 per household".

NVidia are no fun these days.


hdimitrov said:
@Kaapstad point proven. I agree I did not take into account the overclockability and thermal throttling. Sorry if I sounded rude but I haven't entirely woken up yet and did not take all details into consideration. No hard feelings :)
Click to expand...

:)

There are always waterblocks.:D
 
Last edited:
Yeah this will need water for sure. Ah well, I can still say I have a Titan X :D

I'm out of this game now I think. The PS Neo looks pretty good and more than enough for my gaming needs so I think I will bow out gracefully :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

WYP
GTX Retired - Nvidia confirms plan to drop Maxwell, Pascal, and Volta GPU support
Replies
0
Views
62
WYP
WYP
WYP
Nvidia officially announce their £1159 Titan Xp GPU
2 3 4
Replies
61
Views
9K
Atlanta
A
WYP
EK's existing Titan X Pascal Waterblock will support Nvidia's GTX 1080Ti FE
Replies
1
Views
1K
NeverBackDown
N
WYP
AMD announce their first Vega powered GPU accelerator
Replies
10
Views
3K
Warchild
W
WYP
Nvidia has announced their GTX 1080Ti GPU
2
Replies
23
Views
5K
AngryGoldfish
AngryGoldfish
Back
Top