My thoughts on the MSi 970A-G46 motherboard after about six months of use.

Mgutierrez33

New member
Originally, this motherboard (the MSi 970A-G46 if you didn't catch that bit) was purchased as an afterthought to provide a secondary low buck gaming rig for guests that wanted to come over and game but didn't feel like carting around their own rig. My girlfriend had a spare FX-4100 lying around doing nothing, and the local TigerDirect store had a sale going on an MSi 7770 Ghz edition card, so I took the plunge.

The motherboard has a reasonably clean layout throughout with a nicely crafted dark brown PCB. The rest of the color scheme is black and blue, with two PCI-E x16 2.0 slots, two PCI-E x1 slots, and two legacy PCI slots. There are six sata ports in total, with two of them being SATA III, and the other four being SATA II

M452-6253_vcallout03_or_1963472.jpg
(stock photos courtesy of TigerDirect)

The main issue I have with the SATA III ports is their location: if you intended to run SLI or CrossFire on this board, the second card would effectively cut off access to the SATA ports unless you used cables with a 90 degree bend in them. Even then, the plug orientation is upside down, which would require you to plug the 90 degree end in upside down, which makes clean cable routing a bit of a pain, and the board looks kind of awkward at that point. It is important to note, however, that most people who would be considering purchasing this board are most likely on a very tight budget and don't need all of the extra niceities of a higher end AMD board. therefore they probably won't be running dual video cards, so this issue becomes moot.

The rear I/O on this board has six USB 2.0 ports, two USB 3.0 ports an RJ-45 LAN port, legacy PS/2 connector, Optical S/PDIF, and your standard audio ports with a total of eight sound channels from the integrated sound on board (Realtek ALC892).

M452-6253_vcallout04_or_1963472.jpg
(Stock photos courtesy of TigerDirect)

Thus far I have not had any issues with a lack of connectivity on this board. Sound is reasonably clear and crisp with little interference from other components on the computer. My speakers and headset both play nicely with them as well, so for my needs the integrated sound on this board is quite good, and all but the most discerning audiophile should be pleased as well.

Other features on this board include support (reportedly) for memory of up to 2133 Mhz (OC), M-Flash for USB BIOS updating, AMD Cool N' Quiet, and LiveUpdate, an MSI program that allows you to automatically search for the latest board drivers and install them direct through the software with relative ease. The only thing I found irritating with LiveUpdate was the CONSTANT reminder of checking for updates (it does this by scrolling an image either from the top to the bottom, or from the bottom to the top of your screen). The text box that scrolls moves fast enough that it is difficult to click yes or no, or even to disable this function. I also question this boards capacity to support 2133 mhz memory, as the BIOS does not offer this memory speed as an achievable goal and caps at 1866 Mhz.

System Specs:
MSI 970A-G46
AMD FX-4100 @ 4.0 Ghz, 1.36V
Corsair H100i equipped with SP120 Quiet Edition fans
8GB Corsair venceance White LP Low Voltage 1600 Mhz memory O.C. to 1866 with 10-11-10-30 timings, 1.5V
EVGA GTX 560 SuperClocked 2GB GDDR5 (stock clocks)
Crucial M4 128 GB SSD
Seagate Barracuda 1TB 7200 RPM Storage Drive
Corsair Graphite 600T chassis with stock fans front and rear, all fans plugged into integrated fan speed controller running at half speed
OCZ 500W semi-modular PSU
Silverstone White braided cable extensions

Km0yCVl.jpg
(apologies for the poor photo quality, only have a camera. Also I have since added some upward curvature to the video card cables so it looks nicer)

One thing that became immediately apparent upon installation of this board was it's narrow width. There is at least a 1/2" gap between the edge of the board and the end of the CPU cutout on the motherboard tray. Suffice it to say I had to do some very carefully planned cable management inside the chassis to make sure nothing was exposed through this opening, as my OCD would have driven me to drink HEAVILY. The only cabling that is even slightly exposed is the 24 pin cable extender, and this covers itself when it reaches around to the motherboard, so you din't even see it.

The next thing I noticed was during overclocking. The voltages for the CPU are all preset values and tend to jump by rather large values once you hit a certain voltage threshold. Beyond 1.36V, you see a jump to damn near 1.39V, then it calms down. Below 1.36V, you see 1.34, 1.32, then you see ridiculously small intervals from there which don't really make a whole lot of sense. What they probably should have done here was allowed the user to manually enter exact voltage values.

Another odd quirk with this board is how it rounds off your base clock on the processor. As I'm sure everyone has noticed (especially with lower end boards and AMD boards in general), the base clock speeds are not quite what the actual advertised base clock should be once in the OS environment. In the case of this board, my base clock of 200 Mhz is registering at 199.44 Mhz. With my x20 multiplier, this brings me to 3.98 Ghz clock speed... slightly disconcerting, but again bear in mind I am incredibly OCD with this sort of thing, and for the math to be that horrifically off hurts my heart in ways you can't imagine. I tend to brush it off anymore, remembering that this rig (for the time being) only has an FX-4100 in the socket, so overclocking is only going to do so much for me here.

I have also recently run into an odd issue with the way the motherboard registers hard drives: for some strange reason, after I had to reformat my SSD (was getting bad boot files keeping me from even repairing it. Checked, not the drive's fault), the motherboard switched to IDE compatibility for the SATS ports... for the life of me I can't even begin to fathom why in the world it randomly did this, but it did. Naturally I corrected the problem, switched it to AHCI... and had to reformat AGAIN because somehow Windows did not like this change :mad:.

Of note for some of you out there: the north bridge on this motherboard gets scalding hot. Compared to the north bridge heatsink, the MOSFET heatsink feels like the inside of my freezer. During even idle operation I can barely touch the heatsink without the fear that I may receive a second degree burn on my finger (duh, I know). I have not taken actual temperature readings as I have yet to purchase a laser heat gun, however it hasn't impacted my system stability to this point so I am leaving it as "not a problem."

Ever since working out the few issues I had with this board it has actually been a rather pleasant experience. Everything is aesthetically pleasing, the processor runs strong (as AMD processors go x-P), and I have managed a successful overclock of my Corsair memory with little to no fuss. The BIOS, though clunky at times, is easy to navigate and relatively easy to understand. It also has a ClickBIOS program that you can use to access the BIOS from within the OS environment, allowing you to make changes to your system while it is running (a system restart is required for the changes to take effect). I actually prefer to use ClickBIOS, as it is far less clinky, and there is a sidebar with explanation of any feature that the user may not understand (I'm still learning myself).

When all is said and done, for a price of $80 US dollars, the capacity to competently overclock and undervolt, support for dual video cards, memory overclocking, an easy to use BIOS, plenty of USB ports and only the lack of an internal USB 3.0 header, you really can't go wrong with this board. Apart from the oddities I encountered (which have not resurfaced since), it provides a solid, stable platform for your AMD machine and should serve you well for as long as the socket is usable. I would give this 4/5 stars (for my rating system).

For those of you who are possibly in the market to get a budget friendly yet potent AMD system for your needs, I hope you found this review informative and helpful. If you have any more questions on this product or the others that were used in this system please feel free to ask!
 
thank you for your catch-up on using this product.
well brought up about the likes and dislikes as well as why someone would need
this product.

again, thanks!
 
thank you for your catch-up on using this product.
well brought up about the likes and dislikes as well as why someone would need
this product.

again, thanks!

Thanks! Wish I had caught the two or three typos I found in there, but hey it's not pro grade stuff I was intending to produce (yet). I try to be as professional and honest with my opinions of the products I use as I can without expressing any sort of bias towards any particular brand. Actually, I purchased this board on a whim, as I couldn't really FIND any reviews on the product at the time of purchase (poor AMD :-[). I also wanted hands-on experience with not only an MSi product, but an AMD product that I had never used before. I figured worst case scenario, I have to either RMA the board or exchange the board for something different/"good-er" Thankfully it all turned out alright, so I figured that those out there who were looking to NOT break the bank and wanted something AMD would appreciate this.
 
UPDATE ON THIS PRODUCT:

Having been under continuous use for quite some time, I have gotten to know this product a fair bit better than I previously even did. I have discovered a very critical piece of information that is nowhere to be found on the MSI website directly, and in fact had to look up through a different resource: The power phase on this is a mere 4+1, so I do NOT advise utilizing this board with anything more than a 6-core FX processor. Main reason being that I am currently attempting to use an FX 8-core (my girlfriend was kind enough to buy me an FX-8350 this past weekend), and if I make any effort to stress test the CPU under any kind of load I see an unnecessarily large amount of vDroop. I have patched to the latest BIOS and run everything at stock settings, and I still see some rough vDroop, so essentially if you DO intend on using this board with an 8-core processor, do not attempt to tune it in any way; plug and play at best. Realistically though, for most that will be using the AMD platforms if you intend on doing anything with the 8-core units then you will typically be purchasing something like the UD3/UD5, the Sabertooth, or the Crosshair Formula-Z, and not wasting time on a board this cheap x-).

All in all I am still quite impressed with this product, all things considered. The new BIOS patch appears to correct much of the odd base clock issues that I originally had with the board, and if you are looking for just using the FX-4350 or 6350 then you should do just fine with this board and not really miss out on much, assuming you spend the money correctly. A build I would recommend around a board such as this would be something like:

MSI 970A-G46
AMD FX-4350
CPU cooler of your choice
Corsair Carbide 500R
nVidia GTX 650Ti BOOST/660 (depending on the deals available)
8GB Corsair Vengeance LP 1600 Mhz memory
120/128 GB SSD of your choice

Seeing as how this is very similar to what I was running before I upped to the 8 core processor, I can attest to the reliable performance that a machine of this type can offer. You wind up getting mid-range setting capability at 1080P with even games the likes of Metro 2033 being reasonably playable given the right setting choices and a bit of careful system tuning. You wouldn't really want for anything unless you are like me, and have since become intensely jaded from having a once very powerful rig by comparison x-).
 
yeah i have the msi 990xa gd55 an i think its supposed to have an 8+2 power phase, but i cant get my fx6100 past 4ghz it fails an my volts for 3.9ghz are 1.42v
 
I remember the Northbridge in my 790FX Gigabyte board used to be too hot to actually keep your hand there.

Although I actually don't find the 990FX UD5 I have to be nearly as bad, it's a little hot, but nowhere near how hot the 790FX was. I can easily keep my hand on the heatsink.

How are you liking the 8350 as an upgrade over the 4100 BTW?
 
Last edited:
i have the 990fx gd65 and the vrm heatsink on that is pushing 100c when running my 8320 at anything higher than 4.4ghz

cannot for the life of me get a prime95 stable rig above 4.4 even when running 1.5vcore
 
I currently have this board and have owned close to 8 months now. it's funny you bring up the power phase Since I originally bought it with an 8320and had absolutely no idea. it wasn't until I tried overclocking it about two months in did I realize something was wrong. I went to overclock. net since that's just where you go if you have inquires on anything computer *wink*wink* haha and that was where I found the information on power phasing for this board. I've yet to run into any issues with stock voltages and core clocks However I do keep a keen eye on what's going on during gaming thanks to hwmonitor.
furthermore, your review was fantastic and sums up my thoughts perfectly. cheers to lads like yourself. cheers again!
 
I remember the Northbridge in my 790FX Gigabyte board used to be too hot to actually keep your hand there.

Although I actually don't find the 990FX UD5 I have to be nearly as bad, it's a little hot, but nowhere near how hot the 790FX was. I can easily keep my hand on the heatsink.

How are you liking the 8350 as an upgrade over the 4100 BTW?

I LOVE this processor by comparison. I noticed a huge performance increase in games with what was otherwise the same hardware installed. Minimum framerates were higher and in some cases maximums increased as well, though not by HUGE margins. The 4100 is still capable as far as I'm concerned for lower tier gaming machines, but if you PRESENTLY only have a choice of processors in that pricing bracket I would go for an APU based build due to the strong integrated video solution offered and what appears to potentially be better dual graphics functionality.

thompsonhunt said:
I currently have this board and have owned close to 8 months now. it's funny you bring up the power phase Since I originally bought it with an 8320and had absolutely no idea. it wasn't until I tried overclocking it about two months in did I realize something was wrong. I went to overclock. net since that's just where you go if you have inquires on anything computer *wink*wink* haha and that was where I found the information on power phasing for this board. I've yet to run into any issues with stock voltages and core clocks However I do keep a keen eye on what's going on during gaming thanks to hwmonitor.
furthermore, your review was fantastic and sums up my thoughts perfectly. cheers to lads like yourself. cheers again!

Thanks for the kind words mate! I would be posting even more reviews up here, however I have limited access to hardware that would be relevant to post up here. Ultimately I want to try to cover the angles that don't typically get covered by mainstream reviews, be they here or through another website, to give a more comprehensive coverage angle without inundating TTL and crew with ALL of the requests to review ALL of the hardware. I HAVE the time, just not the resources x-). Again, thanks very much for the kind words!

howies said:
i have the 990fx gd65 and the vrm heatsink on that is pushing 100c when running my 8320 at anything higher than 4.4ghz

cannot for the life of me get a prime95 stable rig above 4.4 even when running 1.5vcore

hmmmmm... could be that you have just hit your CPU's ceiling, as it were. 8320's are typically a slightly lower binned version of the 8350 anyway so it MAY have something to do with that, but you may want to hit up the overclock boards and ask some of the guys there for some additional help! I have not had experience with the GD65 myself, however I HAVE heard/seen that the GD80 V2 tends to net somewhat better overclocking results as it most likely has cleaner power delivery (better chokes?) at higher voltages (similarly to the way the 990FX UD5 tends to be more stable at higher clocks and voltages than the UD3).
 
Last edited:
Back
Top