WYP
News Guru
LG is going all-in on the gaming monitor market!
Read more about LG's 27GL850G 1440p Nano IPS G-Sync monitor.
Read more about LG's 27GL850G 1440p Nano IPS G-Sync monitor.
Last edited:
They've stuck a turntable platter to the back !
The boot remover could come in handy though. I often find it hard getting mine off, after a hard day.
haha it looks like it has mesh in it.
I don't get this new trend in monitors. All of the nice stuff they waste money on is all on the back, what you don't see. That Alienware monitor I bought looked beautiful in the pics but sat in front of it you would never know lol. It just looks like a normal, bland, small monitor.
I dont like overclocking screens. Refresh has to be native for me to accept it. When you overclock, you can sometimes see scanlines in some games depending on the type. E.g. RPG where you have windows with text pop up to read quests. Its quite visible there.
Maybe its because of this silly craze now, to light up the back of you monitor so your wall has the same colours...
Not quite the same thing, though you can get ~£50-£300 products that mimic content-aware-backlighting on any device(Or just use a Pi and a HDMI capture device with an I2C 5050 strip & LED driver and make your own, though I'm not sure you'd save much on that £50).£5 for a 3m RGB LED strip lol.
That's only really if the overclock goes beyond what the panel is physically capable of, what some people don't realise when they overclock their monitor is that even though the panel is technically attempting to refresh at that given rate the limit often becomes the G2G or W2B response times, and if they're longer than the frame time then you end up with missed frames, half-frames, scanlines, muddled colours and various other artefacts. In fact, sometimes you actually end up with fewer frames being displayed per second than you started with(And when many consumers do it they almost always end up with fewer complete frames per second).
If you have a high enough frame rate camera you can find your monitors actual stable maximum overclock though, and given it's only a 0.5ms(~10%) difference between 144Hz and 160Hz that shouldn't be much of an issue in this case, compared to say overclocking a 60Hz monitor to 120Hz, where's it's a ~8ms(100%) difference.
Yeah, I wouldn't like to rely on that. Like, pushing something out of spec in order to make it do what it should do within spec.
I would never buy anything overclocked tbh. Not even a PC, because it can lead to issues and the first thing the builder will do is just put it back to stock meaning you paid for air.
I wasn't aware monitors were sold pre-overclocked, though I'd have assumed they'd test it professionally first, was it a manufacturer overclock or a seller/third party?
I wasn't aware monitors were sold pre-overclocked, though I'd have assumed they'd test it professionally first, was it a manufacturer overclock or a seller/third party?
I wasn't aware monitors were sold pre-overclocked, though I'd have assumed they'd test it professionally first, was it a manufacturer overclock or a seller/third party?