Ivy bridge hits 7ghz!

[unknownuser200]

Intel has a new king in terms of overclocking; apparently the new "Ivy Bridge" Core i7-3770k managed to hit an astounding 7 Ghz

http://legitreviews.com/news/12536/ read more here!

 

[Tindo]

Thats EXTREME

 

[MaXiMiZe]

Yup seen it a few days ago. I think we all know that we're not going to achieve that with air/water cooling

 

[unknownuser200]

what was the old record for sandy bridge?

 

[nepas]

errrrrr

1.889 Volts on a 63x multiplier at 112.11 MHz on the bus for a 7.06 Ghz overclock using dry ice

and this matters because?

 

[chris8224]

This it looking good for IB, lets hope that most of them will be able to hit a safe and stable 5Ghz on air

 

[michaelah500]

errrrrr

and this matters because?

I believe it's good to see the voltage differences between previous generations of CPU to show the change in overclocking since the previous release.

It's like the recently leaked CPU-Z screenshot - showing 4GHz on 1.1v. That's immense. Seeing the voltage vs. Frequency is important. In my opinion anyway.

 

[nepas]

I believe it's good to see the voltage differences between previous generations of CPU to show the change in overclocking since the previous release.

It's like the recently leaked CPU-Z screenshot - showing 4GHz on 1.1v. That's immense. Seeing the voltage vs. Frequency is important. In my opinion anyway.

4.4@1.1v sounds good,BUT using 1.8v on these means nothing(hell its on a par with the volts to mhz that P4's did,and this is supposed to be progress?

Maybe I was expecting too much from Ivy.I dunno

 

[airdeano]

agreed, no speak of stability, functional usages just a number.

i hope IB is as open as they are portraying.

seems SB has settled in the 4.9-4.5 OC for stability and longevity.

does IB feel that the 5.5-6.0 give the same return for stability.

no comments have come out yet from the camp.

airdeano

 

[Sinthetic]

This is great, but I don't think we'll see any stable 6GHz on this chip like most have hoped for. It would be nice though. :/ I'm okay with the 5.0GHz range. But who knows only time will tell.xD

 

[Legacy-ZA]

I wish it was launched already, I am very curious to see what IB is made out of. So far the overclocks look promising.

 

[stevenwright6379]

agreed, no speak of stability, functional usages just a number.

i hope IB is as open as they are portraying.

seems SB has settled in the 4.9-4.5 OC for stability and longevity.

does IB feel that the 5.5-6.0 give the same return for stability.

no comments have come out yet from the camp.

airdeano

They were using dry ice

this will never be a 24/7 stable overclock, thats not what they are trying to achieve out of it. It was purely Lets see the highest speed it will boot at type run

 

[DarthDudo]

Exactly what Mr.Strawberry said and also to take the crown from AMD

Anybody know what the highest SandyBridge Overclock was?not SB-E but SB?

 

[stevenwright6379]

SB has a locked multi of x59 and with very limited base clock adjustments i believe the highest is between 5.9GHz and 6GHz

quick look on hwbot and this is it 6.0443GHz

http://hwbot.org/submission/2177360_nickshih_cpu_frequency_core_i7_2600k_6044.3_mhz

 

[DarthDudo]

SB has a locked multi of x59 and with very limited base clock adjustments i believe the highest is between 5.9GHz and 6GHz

quick look on hwbot and this is it 6.0443GHz

http://hwbot.org/submission/2177360_nickshih_cpu_frequency_core_i7_2600k_6044.3_mhz

Thank you Mr.Strawberry!

 

[unknownuser200]

well see that must be quiet and iumprovment if it went up almost 1ghz past its previous Gen. meaning these SHOULD be monster daily overclockers to

. now im going to day dream about an sr3 with two IVY bridge E 10 cores ha

 

[michaelah500]

Exactly what Mr.Strawberry said and also to take the crown from AMD

Anybody know what the highest SandyBridge Overclock was?not SB-E but SB?

Unfortunately it didn't take the crown from AMD though. AMD FX record is over 8GHz.

Saying that...AMDs clock speeds don't really speak for anything. Bulldozer = Shocking.

 

[DarthDudo]

Unfortunately it didn't take the crown from AMD though. AMD FX record is over 8GHz.

Saying that...AMDs clock speeds don't really speak for anything. Bulldozer = Shocking.

Thanks for the clarification I remember hearing AMD's record was sub 7GHz I keep hearing 6.7 in my head

 

[Nculver]

Unfortunately it didn't take the crown from AMD though. AMD FX record is over 8GHz.

Saying that...AMDs clock speeds don't really speak for anything. Bulldozer = Shocking.

Well you have to take into consideration cooling, dry ice does not equal liquid helium. On liquid helium IB might be able to beat out bulldozer even in frequency.

 

[circit]

me gusta