GT640...384 shaders?!

[SOA_RRU]

Anyone got any hard PPD results??? 384 shaders on a card that only costs £75 seems

Some seem to think it will perform as good as a 560Ti, others seem to think just above a 550Ti???

 

[TheOneHalf]

the 560 ti has less shaders I dont know. it might

 

[Big WigglyStyle]

GTX 640 performs worse than the 7750 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BSL8tqUpzQg&feature=g-user-u

 

[stevehat1]

IIRC 560 TI is 384 shaders, 560 is 336, and 560TI 448 is 448 shaders

 

[FTR.4500MHz]

LOL , Crazy Elric !

 

[PetrolHead247]

GTX 640 performs worse than the 7750

But that's not in F@H, that's in gaming and a couple benchmarks. The GT640 has 384 cuda cores (which is what F@H utilises i do believe) so in theory it should yield some awesome points, and seeing as the cuda count is the same as the 560TI in theory it should also yield extremely similar PPD's to the 560TI. If it does turn out to be as good of a folder as a 560TI i could seriously see dedicated folding rigs with these cards in

 

[006409]

folding at home does but remeber nvidia changed the architecture so there not directly comparable

 

[Big WigglyStyle]

But that's not in F@H, that's in gaming and a couple benchmarks. The GT640 has 384 cuda cores (which is what F@H utilises i do believe) so in theory it should yield some awesome points, and seeing as the cuda count is the same as the 560TI in theory it should also yield extremely similar PPD's to the 560TI. If it does turn out to be as good of a folder as a 560TI i could seriously see dedicated folding rigs with these cards in

Didn't realize this was in F@H lol sorry, but the 680 has like 1500 cuda cores and the 580 has like 500 the architecture is too different like gs said