Differentiating AMD CPU's (56k Beware!)

FragTek

New member
Athlon64 CPUs:

Manufactured in 0.13µ, The first desktop CPU to support 64bit instructions and memory addressing. Available with 512KB & 1mb of L2 cache. With a 400mhz (200 FSB) bus, and with 3 different socket types:

ath64_front_back.jpg


01ath640ze.jpg


Core Names:

01_ath64_cores.jpg


Mobile Athlon64 CPUs:

Also manufactured in 0.13µ, and with 64bit instructions and memory addressing, but designed for Laptops, with less power consumption. With 512KB & 1mb of L2 cache. With a 400mhz (200 FSB) bus and available only in socket 754, with two consumption flavors, 62 and 35 Watts.

ath64mfullinfov21aq.jpg


Sempron & Mobile Sempron CPUs:

Semprons use the Thorton or T-bred b core. These have 128kb L1 (64 data + 64 instruction), and 256kb of L2 cache. They operate with a stock FSB of 166(333 effective)mhz. Their Multipliers are also locked. They are fabbed using 130nm process. (from eneuman's thread ^_^)

Sempron:

Bus is 333mhz (166 FSB). Core is made in a 0.13µ. process and 84 sq. mm. in area. Only the 3000+ has 512kb L2 Cache

semprons.jpg


Mobile Sempron:

Only difference is the variation of L2 Cache and the lower Wattage

06_semprons.jpg


Mobile Athlon XP CPUs:

Mobile Athlon XP (Barton):

Manufactured in 0.13µ, available with 512KB of L2 cache. With a 266mhz bus (133 FSB) and with lower vCore than their non-mobile brothers (for the exception of the 3000+)

bartonmobile.jpg


Mobile Athlon XP (Thoroughbred):

Manufactured in 0.13µ, with 1.45 vCore and 256KB L2 Cache.

There are actually a lot of mobile T-Breds: 2200+ was the highest 45w, 2000+ was the highest 35w. Thanks WiCKeD!

05_athXP_m_tbred.jpg
 
Athlon XP CPUs:

Athlon XP (Barton):

Flagship chip was XP 2500+ (1.83GHz). As the TBred B (manufactured in 0.13µ), but now available with 512KB of L2 cache. With a 333mhz (166 FSB) bus available at 2500+ (1.833GHz), 2800+, 3000+ (2.17GHz) and finally the 3200+ and 3400+ with 400mhz bus (200 FSB).

barton.jpg


Athlon XP (Thorton):

Visually the same as the Barton, with 333mhz bus but 256KB of L2 cache.

thorton.jpg


Athlon XP (Thoroughbred A):

Launched with the XP 2200+ (1.8GHz). As the Palomino, but with the difference that it was originally made with a 0.18µ. core, and then changed to 0.13µ. process, which makes it possible to work with less core voltage (1.5 to 1.65v, against 1.7 to 1.75v from Palominos), therefore, they do not heat as much. They can operate at higher frequencies. Core is 80 sq. mm. in area.

Available from 1700+ (1.466GHz) to 2200+ (1.8GHz)

thoroughbreda.jpg


Athlon XP (Thoroughbred B):

Launched with the XP 2400+ (2GHz). Bus is 266mhz (133 FSB) and 333mhz (166 FSB). It's practically the same as the TBred A, but the manufacturing process is refined, has more layers, and it's fabricated at FAB30 in Dresden, Germany. Core was then made in a 0.13µ. process. Core is 84 sq. mm. in area.

Available from 1700+ (1.466GHz) to 2800+ (2.250GHz)

thoroughbredb.jpg


Athlon XP (Palomino):

Were launched after the Tbirds. Also 0.18µ, with 256KB of L2 Cache and all operate at 266mhz bus (133 FSB). Core is also 128 sq. mm.

SSE instruction set was implemented (from Pentium 3s)

Available from 1500+ (1.333GHz) to 2100+ (1.7GHz).

palomino.jpg


Table for AthlonXP recognition:

04_athXPs.jpg


Athlon MP CPUs:

08_athlonMPs.jpg


Opteron CPUs:

High-end CPUs to directly compete against Intel Xeons. All currently available with 1mb L2 cache and socket 940.

opteron1.jpg


07opterons7pp.jpg


Duron (Applebred) CPUs:

Low end CPUs, to directly compete against Intel Celerons, beating them by a good margin.

09_durons1.jpg
 
lol, forgot these...

AMD Athlon (Thunderbird Core, 0.18 Micron's)

thunderbird.jpg


slota.jpg


AMD Duron (Spitfire Core, 0.18 Micron's)

spitfire.jpg


AMD Duron (Morgan Core, 0.18 Micron's)

morgan.jpg


AMD Athlon MP (0.18 Micron's)

athlonmp.jpg


AMD Athlon MP (0.13 Micron's)

athlonmpa.jpg


:D :D :D
 
mrbeef said:
lol nice job man

200 hours though how on earth did u have the patiants to do that

hehe someone else did it not me, hell I don't even remember where I got it from now :p
 
I've seen it on AMD's support forums....might be from there

Still anyone who hasn't ever done a guide: it takes a lot of effort to do this shit :)
 
name='kempez815' said:
Still anyone who hasn't ever done a guide: it takes a lot of effort to do this shit
Agreed!!! it's extremely time consuming to ensure that the information is totally accurate and factual, but also so that it can be understood by everyone. :)
 
Back
Top