Cooler Master Intros 120mm Turbine Master Fan Series

[gaurang]

A maximum air flow of 56.5 CFM at 1200 RPM from 16 removable blades... a nice piece of equipment from Cooler Master.

Read more

 

[TMaksimov]

They look awesome if nothing else!

 

[murphy7801]

Im sorry 21 dcb at 56 cfm is not that great unless it under a £5 otherwise jog on because pleanty other companys make much better produsts.

 

[Tortuga]

It really does look like a turbine....Plz work good!!

 

[marick626]

How do these compare to the Silverstone Air Penetrators? I couldn't care less about looks.

 

[Stryker64]

Im sorry 21 dcb at 56 cfm is not that great unless it under a £5 otherwise jog on because pleanty other companys make much better produsts.

Well if you think about Noctua also has cfm values near that, but I've said it before and I shall say it again, static pressure, the ability for fans to push air through things such as heatsinks and radiators. Noctuas excel at this, and looking at this fan, I would think these will too.

 

[MorbiousStone]

I agree just the design alone is proven in airplanes but I've never heard a super quite one

 

[Stryker64]

Found the stats of the fans.

 

[Stryker64]

So comparing the 1200RPM model with a Noctua NF-P12

Cooler Master | Noctua

RPM: 1200 | 1300

Airflow: 56.5CFM | 54.3CFM

Pressure: 0.91mmH20 | 1.68mmH20

Power: 2.3W | 1.08W

Noise: 21.1dB | 19.8dB

Price: $16 AUD | $29 AUD

So which would I choose? The Noctua slightly lower CFM, but significantly higher pressure, meaning when put in use with a radiator or heatsink, it's effective CFM will be higher. But considering it's price next to a Noctua, it is a reasonable choice. $16 AUD is roughly 10 pounds, so you can decide for yourself if you think it's worth it.

 

[murphy7801]

enermax magma 69 cfm at 18dB

 

[Stryker64]

enermax magma 69 cfm at 18dB

Which has 1.4mmH20 of pressure therefore better in very way than the turbine, but at least in Australia costs more than the Turbine, $26 as opposed to the $16 for the turbine.

 

[Stryker64]

How do these compare to the Silverstone Air Penetrators? I couldn't care less about looks.

Silverstone AP12 has lower CFM 35.36 as opposed to 56.5, while being a bit louder than the 1200RPM version of this fan. But it's in a league when it comes to static pressure reaching 1.71mmH20. For think radiators I would probably go with e Air Penetrator, but for heatsinks I think I would rather go for the turbine.

 

[murphy7801]

Which has 1.4mmH20 of pressure therefore better in very way than the turbine, but at least in Australia costs more than the Turbine, $26 as opposed to the $16 for the turbine.

In the uk the enermax magma only £8 which is bargin since it even bets noctuas.