Catzilla Now Supports 4K - Flagship GPU Performance Review

[WYP]

Let's have a look at Nvidia's GTX 980Ti and AMD R9 Fury X in AllPlayer's Catzilla benchmark, which was recently updated to support 4K resolutions.

Read more on Catzilla's 4K benchmark and GPU performance.

 

[NeverBackDown]

Why would you consider adding this to your usual benchmark tool? I'm sure with this benchmark a 980 could keep up with the FX. I don't see how it's not a Nvidia biased tool

 

[Wraith]

Why would you consider adding this to your usual benchmark tool? I'm sure with this benchmark a 980 could keep up with the FX. I don't see how it's not a Nvidia biased tool

I know a few biased tools, doesn't matter which benchmark is used they will always be considered biased depending on the results.

Keep calm and carry on benching.

 

[WYP]

Why would you consider adding this to your usual benchmark tool? I'm sure with this benchmark a 980 could keep up with the FX. I don't see how it's not a Nvidia biased tool

It would be interesting to see how architectural changes in the new GPUs will affect things.

I have reran the benches a few more times and think it varies a little too much run to run to be used properly, as well as the overall nvidia slant it has.

we only did test two GPUs and that is not really enough to know whether or not it is a worthy tool. I would be nice to have a little more than the usual 3DMARKS etc.

 

[NeverBackDown]

I know a few biased tools, doesn't matter which benchmark is used they will always be considered biased depending on the results.

Keep calm and carry on benching.

Not always, but when a benchmark shows a weaker card outperforming a card that is faster, you know it's not accurate. I can't find any results of the 980, but with how far behind the FX was I don't see how they couldn't be even or 980 ahead. Most benchmarks are Nvidia biased anyways, they just turn on as much tessallation as they can and Nvidia cards will always end up doing better. It'd be more realistic if benches used 16x tess as that is closer to real world application.

It would be interesting to see how architectural changes in the new GPUs will affect things.

I have reran the benches a few more times and think it varies a little too much run to run to be used properly, as well as the overall nvidia slant it has.

we only did test two GPUs and that is not really enough to know whether or not it is a worthy tool. I would be nice to have a little more than the usual 3DMARKS etc.

Yes it will be interesting. If AMD can improve tess performance/get stronger Async Compute Engines/ and better IPC, that alone would be a big advancement.

Yeah with only two cards it's not enough to know. You can always get Unigene(heaven/valley)

 

[Kaapstad]

My 4K result.

 

[MrKambo]

 

[TPC]

295x2 and an I5 that cripples my results OFC.

But CF is really dodgy in Catzilla.

 

[Kaapstad]

295x2 and an I5 that cripples my results OFC.

But CF is really dodgy in Catzilla.

That is actually quite a good result.

 

[TPC]

Got even better. But I CBA to touch this test anymore tbh.

 

[Wraith]

No screens from me but my scores are as follows.

1080p = 24232
1440p = 8171
4k = 834

Could be the lack of "Overcloking" or that my SSDs don't rotate.. this bench is just awful.

 

[barnsley]

No screens from me but my scores are as follows.

1080p = 24232
1440p = 8171
4k = 834

Could be the lack of "Overcloking" or that my SSDs don't rotate.. this bench is just awful.

vram maybe?