Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare has less concurrent players than Farming Simulator 201

[WYP]

Right now Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare has had a disastrous launch on PC, with the game having less concurrent players than Farming Simulator 2017.



Read more on Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare's small PC playerbase.

 

[AlienALX]

I don't think it helps that they did not go for something like Denuvo.

 

[Warchild]

Im glad its failing. Companies need to start reducing the number of releases and extending developer time to make them set apart from their predecessors. Same goes for Battlefield, Assassins creed, etc

 

[wozza365]

To be fair to them, they did increase the CoD cycle to 3 years dev time with 3 different studios working simultaneously. 3 years is more than most. Although what they do in that time is beyond me. Jerk off perhaps?

 

[Greenback]

That's because Farming simulator is better than any Cod game (I maybe a little biased)

Or everyone is playing on windows store

Well 1 person got the windows version, it's cheaper than steams

 

[SeekaX]

It's the fifth time in a row they've done the same setting and they've continuously made it worse with every iteration since BO2. Keeping the terrible elements and adding more terrible ideas on top, there's way too much going on in these games and way too little has any depth. It's like the episode from Futurama where they play blernsball. I hope this marks a turning point in the FPS genre, it has gotten progressively worse ever since gaming became a mainstream hobby. CSGO has shown that an FPS with few but well developed features can attract a large crowd and be financially viable, which hopefully indicates that people have matured enough to look past graphics and gimmicks, because neither one of them make for a rewarding experience long term.

 

[AngryGoldfish]

rip cod

 

[Dawelio]

Lol, just lol... Like NBD said, I don't get why they make a new game like every year? And not even trying to improve upon the graphical aspect of the game lol.

I didn't quite get the multiplayer part, but it does do sound rather bad.

 

[SeekaX]

Lol, just lol... Like NBD said, I don't get why they make a new game like every year? And not even trying to improve upon the graphical aspect of the game lol.

I didn't quite get the multiplayer part, but it does do sound rather bad.

The development of each CoD takes three years, they don't improve the graphics because the consoles can't handle much more at 60fps.

 

[SPS]

Lol, just lol... Like NBD said, I don't get why they make a new game like every year? And not even trying to improve upon the graphical aspect of the game lol.

I didn't quite get the multiplayer part, but it does do sound rather bad.

I think the graphics innovation is vastly overlooked in CoD. Just browse the various whitepapers/presentations from the respective studios. But liked Seeka said, they are limited by hard 60FPS requirement which is much harder to hit than 30FPS.

 

[NeverBackDown]

Lol, just lol... Like NBD said, I don't get why they make a new game like every year? And not even trying to improve upon the graphical aspect of the game lol.

I didn't quite get the multiplayer part, but it does do sound rather bad.

Uh what? I haven't even posted in this thread?

 

[Dawelio]

Uh what? I haven't even posted in this thread?

Sorry, my bad... I meant wozza365