Bigger HDD's on the way

rbanksy

New member
Researchers from Toshiba and Tohoku University in Japan have just announced (subscription) a new method of creating magnetic read heads that could boost hard drive storage density from the current record for a shipping product of 178.8Gb per square inch (also held by Toshiba) to beyond the 1Tb mark.

The proposed next-generation technology would utilize Nanocontact Magnetic Resistance (NC-MR) to boost the magnetoresistance of the drive head. Drive prototypes have demonstrated a magnetoresistance ratio that's twice as large as current read heads (140 percent at room temperature), as well as decreased resistances that should allow for further miniaturization of drive read heads.

Toshiba isn't the only company pushing hard drive areal density forward, as both Hitachi and Seagate have announced their own nascent storage technologies aimed at pushing storage densities above the 1Tb per square inch mark. At least one of these, (Seagate's heat-assisted magnetic recording) will probably be used simultaneously with the NC-MR method discussed above.

Even though 1TB drives are now available and 400GB drives have fallen below the $100 mark, the hard drive industry can scarcely afford to stand still. Not only does the hard drive industry face new competition from solid-state flash-based drives, but the growing popularity of HDTV, IPTV, and DVRs will continue to feed consumers' appetites for locally-stored, high-definition content that's accessible on demand throughout an entire home. Thus far, consumer thirst for huge storage capacities remains strong, which makes Toshiba's announcement all the more timely—though the company doesn't expect to debut new drives based on the NC-MR design for another five years.
 
the drives they have currently are more than I could ever dream of filling at this point. My only bone is the speed. Why hasn't 10k shifted into the default speed yet..?

Ryan
 
Better still, why havent they made the architecture better so HDs arent limited to an 80mb/s rate? Yea, SATAII headroom is nice, but annoying if the HD will never live up to it. I believe the disk drive technology is dead and SSD is the next thing.
 
I guess raid0 is your answer to speed issues, I do wonder myself why 10k rpm isn't the norm...

Nice bit of info rbanksy - can you add a source to that please? ;)
 
name='PP Mguire' said:
Better still, why havent they made the architecture better so HDs arent limited to an 80mb/s rate? Yea, SATAII headroom is nice, but annoying if the HD will never live up to it. I believe the disk drive technology is dead and SSD is the next thing.

that is a very good question tbh, i suppose its the mechanics of the drives that dont allow for such high speeds, SSD is the future.... and will take a long time to be the norm IMO
 
make 15k the default speed, up cache's to like 64mb, then perhaps up the transfer speed to SATA-4 or somthing, at say....160 - 200mbps

then we're talking:D
 
name='Mr. Smith' said:
I guess raid0 is your answer to speed issues, I do wonder myself why 10k rpm isn't the norm...

Nice bit of info rbanksy - can you add a source to that please? ;)

Hmmm, how about they hardwire 2 (or more) drive mechs into 1 x 3.5" unit. I`ve seen old 40g drives almost half the physical height of a regular drive. Use a Raid theory tech internally, and have a regular SATA backplane.

So in essence the user has 1 harddrive unit, that they use like a normal drive - but internally it`s running on a raid theory.

Use two units under Raid0 and u got a theoretical 2 x Raid0 performance.
 
even sata2 doesnt limit the max speed of a hdd today :D i dont even think sata1 is a limit on todays harddrives, sata2 is just marketing AFAIK
 
Sata doesn't pose a limit, even ATA-100 only limits the Raptor drives. I wish they would make 10K RPM drives with two heads, this should go a long way to lowering the access time and should potentially double the throughput.
 
Back
Top