FarFarAway
New member
Well props to Mr Pat EnVias for showing me this 
ATI, it seems are still suffering bad yields on their next-gen stuff. Rumoured to be about 3% yields on their 24pipes chips
This means that they may have to go down to 16pipes on the r520 just to be able to deliver them on 90nm. They looks to be clocking them at 700MHz+, but thats still not very impressive considering they were talking about 32pipes not-so-long ago.
Anyway, looks like another set-back for ATI...
I'm not happy about this - even as a slight nvidia fanboy
Full article @ VR Zone

ATI, it seems are still suffering bad yields on their next-gen stuff. Rumoured to be about 3% yields on their 24pipes chips
This means that they may have to go down to 16pipes on the r520 just to be able to deliver them on 90nm. They looks to be clocking them at 700MHz+, but thats still not very impressive considering they were talking about 32pipes not-so-long ago.
Anyway, looks like another set-back for ATI...
VR-Zone said:We heard that the last R520 spin at TSMC is at 3% yield rate for 24 pipes and we can certainly expect a much lower yield for 32-pipes R520. Obviously ATi is still facing some yield issues for their R520 @ 90nm process and ATI could resort to a 16 pipes R520 for better yield and make up the loss with a much higher core clock of 700MHz+ as INQ has previously suggested. It is still possible for ATi to keep to the time frame of August-September launch if decided to go ahead with 16-pipes R520. If not, 24-32 pipes R520 is expected to delay further to Q4 this year.
I'm not happy about this - even as a slight nvidia fanboy

Full article @ VR Zone