WYP
News Guru
Impressive scores when compared to a 1700X.

Read more about Geekbench's Ryzen 7 2700X benchmark results.

Read more about Geekbench's Ryzen 7 2700X benchmark results.
That 1800x result also has much faster RAM along with more L1 and L2 and L3 cache
So this time, 1800X at 4GHz BUT with memory running at the same 2400MHz as the apparent 2700X, nice little performance jump, wonder how much more it will increase if the 2700X was equipped with 3000MHz or more memory.
![]()
I kinda wish I had waited 4 months to get mine now but as I was on an old A10 6800k I got a massive upgrade as it was.
Faster than either of your scores. That's pretty good imo for a stock CPU.
That new boost 2.0 is really working wonders
Precision Boost 2.0 doesn't work on X370 motherboards, It's exclusive to X470, Meaning it was beating both my scores without it![]()
Still more than 10% slower than my 4690K (4.5Ghz) in single threaded apps..:mellow:
https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/7468132
...still not good enough for my needs, looks like Ryzen 2 on the 7nm die in 2019 will be what I need to wait for.
You're comparing a stock CPU to an OC 4.5ghz one for single threaded performance. Don't see how it's all that fair
Clock your CPU to 3.70GHz, Clock your memory down to 2400MHz then see what your score is![]()
What's fair got to with it?
I run my CPU at the speed it is capable of without any issues and take that as my performance baseline.
If the 2700X can overclock to a similar level and give equal or better performance then I'll take another look at it when the reviews come out.
Why not compare like for like though ?
Clock your CPU to 3.70GHz and your memory to 2400MHz, Then you can see the differences.
I will never run my 4690K at 3.7Ghz so what is the point?
Unless the 2700X can overclock to a level that it will outperform my 4690K, its a completely irrelevant comparison.
Because then you can see the clock for clock improvements over Haswell, No one is saying you should go out and buy a 2700X, I'd personally just be curious.