AMD Fury Nano reportedly coming on August 27th

Got to ask are AMD seeing the sales in Matx, Itx MB sales going up and trying to lead the way in giving a top gaming system in the smallest form factor and case
 
$400-$450 range with 4gb of memory possibly?

If these are Fiji cores, I wonder if it would be something that would be a real overclocker if you could put it under water (once/if ever Fiji is easily OC'ed)?
 
IF this card has a full Fiji XT under the hood ( like many rumors say ) AND it overclocks well ( up to 1/1.1 GHz ) it could be a very interesting card

Well, hoping that it costs less than the Fury. Moreover, it would probably need liquid cooling to overclock enough
 
IF this card has a full Fiji XT under the hood ( like many rumors say ) AND it overclocks well ( up to 1/1.1 GHz ) it could be a very interesting card

Well, hoping that it costs less than the Fury. Moreover, it would probably need liquid cooling to overclock enough

it won't be a full Fiji Core. It'll be a further cut down core from the Fury but it's performance should still be on par with the 290x just consuming nearly half the power at 175W. That's pretty impressive to say the least.
 
it won't be a full Fiji Core. It'll be a further cut down core from the Fury but it's performance should still be on par with the 290x just consuming nearly half the power at 175W. That's pretty impressive to say the least.

Well, most of the rumors about Fiji cards revealed to be true...

It could really be a full Fiji. Higher binned chips, lower voltages and core clocks. Since the R9 Fury X pulls about 250W at 1050 MHz and ( I think ) 1.2V, I can see the Nano reaching 175W @ 800 MHz and 1-1.1V .

Recent AMD cards are clearly out of their "efficient zone" regarding clock speeds IMHO, since they don't overclock as good as kepler and maxwell and they need more volts to get to 1200 MHz.
 
Last edited:
Well, most of the rumors about Fiji cards revealed to be true...

It could really be a full Fiji. Higher binned chips, lower voltages and core clocks. Since the R9 Fury X pulls about 250W at 1050 MHz and ( I think ) 1.2V, I can see the Nano reaching 175W @ 800 MHz and 1-1.1V .

Recent AMD cards are clearly out of their "efficient zone" regarding clock speeds IMHO, since they don't overclock as good as kepler and maxwell and they need more volts to get to 1200 MHz.

Higher binned chips? having the chips to bin would be a start.

This will be the failed Fury X cards.
 
Just like nVidias 980>970>960

Definitely. I just hope you can Crossfire it with a regular Fury/X. I just want it to boost frames at 4k.

The problem right now apparently is the interposer. They really need to get a bloody move on getting these things made.
 
Definitely. I just hope you can Crossfire it with a regular Fury/X. I just want it to boost frames at 4k.

The problem right now apparently is the interposer. They really need to get a bloody move on getting these things made.

It's pretty complicated... It's so big that I believe it was 20% of the actual interposer doesn't even have transistors on it because it's bigger than the max surface area the 40nm part can scale too. The company responsible for making it ramped up production last month so hopefully we start seeing them soon in more numbers
 
Back
Top