Well lesser of two evils but still greedy tbh, they could easily cut 100 off the prices easily.
I don't see it that way. In fact, I blame most of the situation on them. "Less greedy" is still greedy for example, and you say "less greedy" but how do you know?
Everything I can see here tells me they are being
more greedy. Let's look at that logically. Their technology in some ways is better. Better because it performs a reasonable job
at a much lower cost to them. There is no arguing this. Their multi die job is cheaper for them to make than one big one on a lower node. That is a fact. Yet, their prices are basically exactly the same as Nvidia's. One could almost imagine the phone call between Jen and Lisa about this.
Let's also not forget they are still lacking in features over Nvidia. That also brings them back another step.
Thirdly, and why I think they are actually notably worse than Nvidia? they are not competing. AT ALL. Not for them, and most certainly not for US the gamers. This is not competition AT ALL. In fact, it is the opposite. It is just price matching.
I spoke about this on another forum but people were not mature enough to discuss it properly so it got closed down. At the end of the day if someone is acting a c**t one of their mates usually says "Hey man, you know you're acting like a c**t". At which point they either modify their behaviour or people start to avoid them. So why has AMD not done this to Nvidia? why are they enabling them to do this?
I used a comparison on the other forum. The way I see it? have you ever watched my 600lb life? at the side of every piggy fat sod on that show is the person who enables them to be that greedy. Because at the end of the day if it wasn't for that down trodden weak idiot that person, quite simply, would not be able to shove food in their face all day. At some point that person has to take a stand, and say "Nah bro, too much" and pack it in.
AMD can do this by competing. They can't (or won't, I will get onto that next) compete on performance so they should be competing on products and price. The very fact they have not? says it all to me. It really says it all. There is no competition, just price matching. Which is total anti consumer.
Right and lastly we move onto AMD "not being able" to compete. The fact is? THEY CAN. This gen could have easily been better and faster than Nvidia. They have just given up competing. They said some BS along the lines of "But to beat Nvidia we would have to make a $1600 GPU" but that is just toss. No one has ever truly cared about having the world's fastest GPU in their PC apart from the 1% of 1%. Who like I said in another thread, don't even game on it. They buy it, run a few benchmarks, then sell it and buy another.
The way they could have beaten Nvidia both this round AND last? price. I know that was harder last round because Nvidia used Samsung, but their dies clocked faster because they were better. This round? they have absolutely no excuse. Their dies are costing them less than Nvidia by far, due to their design with the multi die. Yet they have not competed AT ALL. Nothing, zero, nada. It was widely said before this launch they could have had their Maxwell moment. TBH? technically speaking they did. They came up with a way to make a much cheaper design and make it fast, whilst costing a lot less. And, they have passed 0% of that onto their buyers. Instead opting to be as greedy as Nvidia if not more so, all based on their CPU clout.
It's absolute toss. The only company competing right now are Intel. And they are. They are decimating AMD and Nvidia in value at the lower mid range. Destroying them even. And, I believe they will do exactly the same if they decide to continue and come up with faster GPUs. At which point both of these greedy f*****s will have no choice but to lower their prices.
Looking at 4070 sales? I think a lot of people are working that out now. So massive kudos to all of the content creators who are now pointing out the VRAM problems and so on.