WYP
News Guru
Last edited:
I managed 30,000 with an air cooled overclocked 1080 Ti for the Graphics score in Firestrike in March 2017, If over 30,000 with an overclock isn't possible with this card then I think AMD need to severely step it up when it comes to Navi high end.
I wouldn't be too worried about that dude. 3DMark hates AMD CPUs and GPUs. Plus that is DX11, which could well be old hat soon.
I wouldn't even worry too much about Timespy scores either. I would be more interested in how it does in BF1 DX12, BFV DX12 and SOTTR in DX12.
Because that, inevitably, is what matters and right now in some DX12 games Vega is touching on 1080tis bottom and easily trumping the 1080. And by law of everything, Radeon VII must be faster.
I reckon solid 1080ti as my bet![]()
In Forza Horizon 4 Vega 64 is 2 FPS behind a 1080 Ti at 1440P Ultra settings, Pretty impressive considering the price difference IMO ^_^
I managed 30,000 with an air cooled overclocked 1080 Ti for the Graphics score in Firestrike in March 2017, If over 30,000 with an overclock isn't possible with this card then I think AMD need to severely step it up when it comes to Navi high end.
AMD doesn't need to 'step up' for synthetic bench results, LOL!
It does if it wants to win mindshare, Benchmarks are a huge tipping point for people looking to buy.
Then those people are idiots, and should be ignored entirely. If that is the behavior of the GPU customer base, no wonder the GPU market is so messed up, LOL.![]()
AMD needs to win mindshare to grow its GPU market share, It's all fine that a Vega 64 is only 2FPS behind a 1080 Ti in Forza Horizon 4 at 1440P but that's 1 game, AMD need a series of wins especially in the big benchmarks to shift market share more to their favour even if it's only a few %, In the end it will only benefit us as customers.
So basically you're saying the problem is: people are idiots. Agreed.
Pretty much yeah ^_^
So basically you're saying the problem is: people are idiots. Agreed. Mindshare means nothing if the minds are sub-par.