Go Back   OC3D Forums > [OC3D] General Forums > OC3D Reviews & Videos
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
  #1  
Old 15-03-17, 04:51 PM
WYP's Avatar
WYP WYP is online now
News Guru
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
Posts: 9,391
Styx: Shards of Darkness PC Performance Review

Styx the Goblin is back with a whole new stealth-based adventure, but how well does this new infiltration game run on PC?



Read more on Styx: Shards of Darkness' PC performance.

__________________
I'm not saying that 1984 is a bad book, but the dystopia we are currently living in has much better worldbuilding.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 15-03-17, 06:05 PM
Lynx's Avatar
Lynx Lynx is offline
OC3D Elite
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Posts: 1,094
Detailed review, much appreciated for a fan of the game.
Any reason why we no longer bench with a 970? It's still the most popular GPU on the Steam Hardware Review.
Would be interesting to see how it degrades over time (nVidia special) compared to 10 series GPUs.
__________________
NZXT S340 / i7-4790 / Gigabyte Z97N-WiFi / TeamGroup Vulcan 8GB / MSI GTX 970 / Sandisk 256GB & 960GB / Super Flower 450W Platinum
XSPC RayStorm / EK-FC970 / EK-D5 XTOP Revo / Alphacool NexXxoS ST30 240 / 4 x Venturi HP-12
Silverstone GD09 / i5-4570 / Gigabyte B85-HD3 / Hynix 8GB / Asus RX 480 OC / Drevo 240GB / WD 3TB Red PRO / EVGA 500W
Acer XB270HA / AOC G2770PF / Corsair K65 / Corsair K65 / Mionix Naos 7000 / Mionix Naos 7000 / Logitech Z333
Phanteks ITX / i5-4690 / Asus H81-Plus / Kingston HyperX 8GB / PowerColour RX470 / Sandisk 240GB / Hitachi 2TB / Corsair CX500M
HP Envy 13" / i5-6200U / 8GB / Samsung 256GB / QHD+ IPS / Fingerprint Reader
Asus N550LF 15" / i5-4200U / 6GB / GT 745M / SK 250GB / Touchscreen
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 15-03-17, 10:55 PM
WYP's Avatar
WYP WYP is online now
News Guru
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
Posts: 9,391
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lynx View Post
Detailed review, much appreciated for a fan of the game.
Any reason why we no longer bench with a 970? It's still the most popular GPU on the Steam Hardware Review.
Would be interesting to see how it degrades over time (nVidia special) compared to 10 series GPUs.
We have never had a 970 in the game stuff as most of the GPUs I test were not provided by 3rd parties (With the GTX 1060 and RX 480 GPUs we use being the exception).

As much as I would love to test a GTX 970, the problem is where does the testing stop? Every new GPU will add more work to do and if I add a GTX 970 I would also need an R9 390 for balance.

This is the big problem when it comes to covering this stuff, as my time is limited and my job is to cover both new games and news content on the website.

When it comes to covering how Nvidia/AMD GPUs age in new games, that is why we still use the R9 Fury X/GTX 980Ti and GTX 960/R9 380 GPUs in out tests, as these GPUs provide some great insight into how older GPUs run on modern games, especially modern DX12 titles.
__________________
I'm not saying that 1984 is a bad book, but the dystopia we are currently living in has much better worldbuilding.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 16-03-17, 07:43 PM
AngryGoldfish's Avatar
AngryGoldfish AngryGoldfish is offline
OC3D Elite
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,234
Man, I'm sick of games that run so poorly on AMD. In this case it's to a ridiculous degree. People moan about games not looking as good as they should be considering they need powerful GPU's. What I care about is parity and reasonable performance from both vendors. This kind of favouritism is incredibly destructive while demanding games in general help further the PC industry.
__________________
MSI Z97 Gaming 7 ⁞⁞ 4670K 4.5Ghz ⁞⁞ Nepton 240M ⁞⁞ ASUS Fury Strix ⁞⁞ Fury 16GB ⁞⁞ Define R4 ⁞⁞ AX760 ⁞⁞ Pexon PC ⁞⁞ Samsung EVO 120 & 500GB ⁞⁞ WD 1TB & 3TB
BenQ XL2730Z ⁞⁞ Mixonix Naos 7000 ⁞⁞ K70 Cherry MX Brown ⁞⁞ Audio-GD NFB-15 ⁞⁞ EVE SC205 ⁞⁞ AKG K7XX ⁞⁞ Fidelio X2
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-05-17, 10:47 PM
Colts Colts is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by AngryGoldfish View Post
Man, I'm sick of games that run so poorly on AMD. In this case it's to a ridiculous degree. People moan about games not looking as good as they should be considering they need powerful GPU's. What I care about is parity and reasonable performance from both vendors. This kind of favouritism is incredibly destructive while demanding games in general help further the PC industry.
It's not favouritism nor is it the developers fault AMD is behind in the GPU market these past few years. This is soley on AMD. When an RX580 with 6.2 tflops competes with GTX 1060 with 3.8 tflops you got an issue fact is Nvidia is more efficient at getting the best performance from each tflop. This is all on AMD and has nothing to do with Developers of gaming or nvidia. If AMD Vega were to take the crown for best GPU it would need to be about 18 TFLOPS to compete with Nvidia 12 TFLOPS this also tells you AMD Vega 12.5 the highend card is only going to compete with GTX 1080 and nothing above it. AMD fanboys need to face this reality AMD just isn't as good as Nvidia at making GPU's but we need both GPU Vendors that is a fact. Just quit being so blind.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-05-17, 01:10 PM
AngryGoldfish's Avatar
AngryGoldfish AngryGoldfish is offline
OC3D Elite
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,234
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colts View Post
It's not favouritism nor is it the developers fault AMD is behind in the GPU market these past few years. This is soley on AMD. When an RX580 with 6.2 tflops competes with GTX 1060 with 3.8 tflops you got an issue fact is Nvidia is more efficient at getting the best performance from each tflop. This is all on AMD and has nothing to do with Developers of gaming or nvidia. If AMD Vega were to take the crown for best GPU it would need to be about 18 TFLOPS to compete with Nvidia 12 TFLOPS this also tells you AMD Vega 12.5 the highend card is only going to compete with GTX 1080 and nothing above it. AMD fanboys need to face this reality AMD just isn't as good as Nvidia at making GPU's but we need both GPU Vendors that is a fact. Just quit being so blind.
I'm no engineer or developer, but you just confirmed what I was saying. When a 3.2 TFLOP GPU can beat a 6.2 TFLOP GPU, would you not say that is in part due to the way games are developed? In the same way a 7600K at 100% load can beat a 6c/12t CPU at 40% load, the infrastructure is not currently suited to such hardware. How is that AMD's fault? I've been disappointed by AMD's choices, but I don't blame them entirely. So I heavily disagree with you: this is not solely on AMD.
__________________
MSI Z97 Gaming 7 ⁞⁞ 4670K 4.5Ghz ⁞⁞ Nepton 240M ⁞⁞ ASUS Fury Strix ⁞⁞ Fury 16GB ⁞⁞ Define R4 ⁞⁞ AX760 ⁞⁞ Pexon PC ⁞⁞ Samsung EVO 120 & 500GB ⁞⁞ WD 1TB & 3TB
BenQ XL2730Z ⁞⁞ Mixonix Naos 7000 ⁞⁞ K70 Cherry MX Brown ⁞⁞ Audio-GD NFB-15 ⁞⁞ EVE SC205 ⁞⁞ AKG K7XX ⁞⁞ Fidelio X2
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-05-17, 04:46 PM
NeverBackDown NeverBackDown is offline
AMD Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Asgard
Posts: 12,269
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colts View Post
It's not favouritism nor is it the developers fault AMD is behind in the GPU market these past few years. This is soley on AMD. When an RX580 with 6.2 tflops competes with GTX 1060 with 3.8 tflops you got an issue fact is Nvidia is more efficient at getting the best performance from each tflop. This is all on AMD and has nothing to do with Developers of gaming or nvidia. If AMD Vega were to take the crown for best GPU it would need to be about 18 TFLOPS to compete with Nvidia 12 TFLOPS this also tells you AMD Vega 12.5 the highend card is only going to compete with GTX 1080 and nothing above it. AMD fanboys need to face this reality AMD just isn't as good as Nvidia at making GPU's but we need both GPU Vendors that is a fact. Just quit being so blind.
The fact that you think TFLOP is the end all be all performance measure along with the fact you have to be insulting by calling people blind, tells me(and others) all we need to know about you. Stick to something you are good at, this isn't it(this being how development works)
__________________
Death is just another path, one that we all must take.
The grey rain-curtain of this world rolls back,
And all turns to silver glass, and then you see it...
White shores, and beyond,
A far green country under a swift sunrise.
-J.R.R Tolkien
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-05-17, 04:52 PM
WYP's Avatar
WYP WYP is online now
News Guru
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
Posts: 9,391
TBH TFLOPs is a useless metric for gaming performance, much like how clock speeds are useless for determining CPU performance.

TFLOPs should only ever be used to compare hardware from the same generation, as performance per clock can change wildly.

One other thing to note that on the Nvidia side they use base/boost clock to get their TFLOP numbers. When was the last time you have seen a Nvidia GPU clock anywhere near their base speeds? GPU Boost 3 ensures that clocks, in reality, are much higher, so the real TFLOP numbers should also be higher.
__________________
I'm not saying that 1984 is a bad book, but the dystopia we are currently living in has much better worldbuilding.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump








All times are GMT. The time now is 03:36 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.