Go Back   OC3D Forums > [OC3D] General Forums > OC3D News
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
  #1  
Old 22-08-09, 12:55 PM
PeterStoba PeterStoba is offline
OC3D Elite
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,190
New Nvidia Names

Nvidia seem to be at it again, this time renaming a whole 3 ranges in one go.

Continue Reading

__________________
Silverstone SG05B | i3 530 | Scythe Shuriken | DFI LanParty MI P55-T36 | 4GB Kingston HyperX 1333Mhz | XFX 5450 512MB | Samsung SN-T083C | Intel X25-V 40GB | Samsung F1 1TB

LGW2452TX-PF | Logitech G9 | Logitech G15 | Logitech Z5500

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 22-08-09, 01:00 PM
SwaleSmith SwaleSmith is offline
OC3D Crew
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 967
this is getting silly now....
__________________
Lian Li V1000 Plus - Core i7 920-Rampage II X58-Watercooled With 2x Feser TFC Xchanger 120mm Rad, EK Supreme Acrylic CPU Block, Laing DDC-1T Ultra Alphacool Top XSPC Res-XFX GTX295 (Overclocked 680/1380/1100mhz) - 3x2GB (6GB Total) Corsair Dominator Triple Channel DDR3 1600mhz - Tagan Piperock 1100w PSU - OCZ Summit 120GB SSD (O.S) - 2x WD Velociraptors Raid-0 (Storage) -Windows 7 RC1 64Bit
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 22-08-09, 03:50 PM
iceie iceie is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 149
they might as well change their company name because the 8 and 9 series is phasing out. just keep the name and keep the gtx 200 series. and for the newer card change the name without the gtx
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 22-08-09, 06:20 PM
mayhem's Avatar
mayhem mayhem is offline
OC3D Elite
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,356
can some one not sue there asses under the new law that has been renamed 5 times under the original law that protects us consumers from these silly gits ...

Im admitted starting get annoyed with Nvidia and will consider my next GPU to be a ATI since i know what the hell ill be buying. (trust me that is not some thing i ever thought i would consider my self saying)
__________________
All support is now handled direct at http://support.mayhems.net/
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 22-08-09, 07:28 PM
Youngie1337 Youngie1337 is offline
OC3D Elite
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Rugby
Posts: 2,630
I'll have a McGTX large please
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 23-08-09, 03:16 AM
arungoyal1666 arungoyal1666 is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 28
haven't they got got nay work except renaming their products
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 23-08-09, 03:07 PM
Rastalovich's Avatar
Rastalovich Rastalovich is offline
OC3D Elite
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Testing hardware somewhere
Posts: 11,421
U look at the 3 digits, u know the relative performance of the cards ur gonna get. Surely looking at a 130/140/whatever, ur gonna know how well it compares to a 275 ? Is that too simplistic ?

Would we prefer the naming convention to have gone Geforce 10800 GTX, with the G300 being Geforce 11800 GTX ?

ATI went from 9000 series to 1000 series, 2000 series, whilst releases of new graphic cards meant a whole lot more than they do now. Why didn't they go 10000/11000/12000 ? Not a tear was shed.

As opposed to big increases in performances, we now get small relative %ages. An nVidia 8800/9800 - which as the corporation has adopted the new naming moving forward, just as ATI did previously, they still represent a valuable purchase in terms of performance.

If the cards are still viable and being sold, what is the issue with calling them a lesser value in relation to the existing naming convention, with numbers that represent the performance u can expect ? Or do we stick with 8800 so the lay person has no idea, on the face of it, how it compares to a 300 ?

Let's not hug out TheInquirer shortcuts too much please.
__________________


Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 23-08-09, 11:45 PM
Ducky Spud Ducky Spud is offline
Advanced Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 377
These just seem pointless changes! Dropping the GTX of the current GTX200's... why? Though changing the lower end cards to a similar format sort of makes sense, normally bigger numbers = better so changing the 8800 into a 130 or whatever makes it easier for the general public to know where it stands in the line up.

This renaming isnt as bad as before e.g. the 9800GTX into a GTX250 despite not having a GTX200 core lol.
__________________
[sigpic][/sigpic]
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 24-08-09, 10:53 AM
Sihastru Sihastru is offline
Advanced Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: You are here.
Posts: 269
Everyone says it is a mess, but it is necessary. There are still people buying the 9500GT 1GB over the 8800GTS 512MB because it has more memory and it has a "9" instead of an "8" and everyone knows that 9 > 8...

The thing is you never add digits to a naming scheme, and the old naming scheme was depleted... that's what happens when you get to 9xxx. Going to 10xxx is not an option.

The same thing will happen with ATI, when they get the HD9850, HD9870, HD9890. You think they'll switch to HD10850, HD10870 and HD10890? no, because the first number will make people crazy, and they won't buy the new series because it is "slower" then the HD2400...

Anyway, what happens now is not a "NEW" renaming, it's the same renaming we've been taking about for a year now... and I see every time someone posts about it people think it's new... this would make the 348729865438th (aprox.) time nVidia renamed it's G92b based cards.
__________________
There are more things in heaven and earth then are dreamt of in your philosophy.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump










All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.