Come on WYP, I mean what is the point of copy pasting this article which has been doing the rounds since yesterday. Just look at the memory capacity the 0 is overlapping the 4. Are you really that short of clicks around here ?
It's a blurry image that was taken from an online video which was itself taken from a camera pointed at a screen.
I have since double-checked, and other sources are using a similar image. On Videocardz they used a less blurry and lacks the overlap that you are talking about.
For using their image, I will link to Videocardz's article.
https://videocardz.com/newz/nvidia-geforce-rtx-3080ti-20gb-allegedly-tested
As mentioned in the article, any RTX 3080 Ti/Super graphics card will offer performance that is very close to the RTX 3090. I believe that there are aspects of this article/rumour that will remain relevant even if the source turns out to be false.
I have also stated in the article that these results are suspect and that they could easily be fabricated.
TBH I don't even know why I am responding to this comment. These are alleged benchmarks that even I said were suspect. Regardless, I feel that the results shown are pretty much what I'd expect from any RTX 3080 Ti or Super series GPU, so I think this is worth talking about.
A graphics card like the one alleged in this case would make the RTX 3090 almost pointless, as would a standard RTX 3080 with a 20GB frame buffer.
--------------------
As a side note folks, please try to be constructive with criticism. Feel free to criticise or question my work as much as you want, but I don't want to be verbally attacked here.