AMD's RDNA 2 graphics cards reportedly contain more features than its console variant

[AngryGoldfish]

Originally Posted by NeverBackDown

Well MS and Sony would have guaranteed contracts to sell or at least pay x amount of money regardless of how many sold so AMD would still turn a profit.

That's true, but what I mean to say is, if AMD wants to sell a €700 GPU to desktop users, it has to offer more than what the consoles offer.

[KingNosser]

It's already kinda common knowledge that the top end will be 80CU part.

[tgrech]

Originally Posted by KingNosser

It's already kinda common knowledge that the top end will be 80CU part.

Where's this from? I've heard it pushed around but 80CU's seems to be monstrous overkill, in theory they could get 50% performance over a 2080Ti at 64CU's if RDNA2's gains are as previously stated.

Edit: Actually, I guess it would be a CDNA part? That makes a lot more sense, a V100 style chip.

[KingNosser]

I've heard it a fair few times, YT peeps like AdoredTV and such but enough to feel it's solid enough general opinion that it could be the case, time will tell really but I do feel that nvidia should be concerned generally.

I personally don't feel amd's aim is to outdo the 2080ti but to outdo the 3080ti, it is after all in house refered to as the nvidia killer.

yea Idk if it would be cdna or rdna but the 80CU has been talked about a lot