Go Back   OC3D Forums > [OC3D] General Forums > OC3D News
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
  #11  
Old 10-01-19, 05:24 AM
HJ1mech HJ1mech is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 85
Quote:
Originally Posted by looz View Post
Wait, is that beating 9900k with a 8/16 configuration? In that case, impressive.


Edit: yes it is. 9900k is stock so 4.7GHz all cores.
Especially when you consider there is a strong possibility that the chip they used in the demo was the Ryzen 5 3600X

Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-01-19, 05:28 AM
looz's Avatar
looz looz is offline
OC3D Elite
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,121
We don't even know their naming scheme...
__________________
i7 8700k 4.9GHz - 2x8Gb 3600MHz CL15-15-15-34 - GTX 970 - 512GB 970 & 850 EVO
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-01-19, 06:34 AM
Eddie long's Avatar
Eddie long Eddie long is offline
Advanced Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 372
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dicehunter View Post
Looking at the substrate on the Ryzen 3000 that Dr Su held up it looks like there are traces for another chiplet, The larger die is apparently the I/O segment and the smaller one is the actual core and if you look underneath there is room for another, Meaning a 16 core Ryzen AM4 part is quite possible.



It dose look possible , but maybe i can see a 12 core coming to AM4 socket in the future and leaving 12 core plus on TR4
__________________
Life isn't always a bowl of cherry's.
Sometimes it's HARD WORK
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-01-19, 10:00 AM
tgrech tgrech is offline
Advanced Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: UK
Posts: 407
Quote:
Originally Posted by HJ1mech View Post
Especially when you consider there is a strong possibility that the chip they used in the demo was the Ryzen 5 3600X
Nah we can be pretty sure now that the leaked naming schemes, clock speeds, pricing, ect were false(If their ridiculous prices didn't already give that away), they don't really line up with what we've been shown or how positioning would place these chips, AMD aren't going to undercut Intel by hundreds of dollars if they're outperforming them. If this will be their top end chip on launch it'll probably be the 3700X again, it'd make most sense to bring out a 3820 and 3850 later given the 800 tier is now vacant between 8-core top end and Threadrippers bottom end (900 tier). Bringing 8-cores to the 600 tier would be a mess for marketing, given there's no way the fastest consumer processor on the market is going to launch at under £200.
__________________
Electrical engineer with a passion for rambling.

Check out my latest piece of commissioned work: https://twitter.com/smart_tilt
[Note, it's a company page not run by me, I just did the electronics & software design work]
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump










All times are GMT. The time now is 08:21 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.