 |
|

12-06-19, 05:18 PM
|
Advanced Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Essex UK
Posts: 483
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warchild
change the link to [img] maybe?
|
I tried that obviously Idk is odd
ty for fix, the link I got didn't have the .jpg but it's handy info for another time
|

12-06-19, 07:41 PM
|
 |
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,678
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingNosser
I tried that obviously Idk is odd
|
I fixed your post. What you need to do is open the link you posted, then right click on the image and copy link address. It will have a .jpg on the end of it:
https://i.imgur.com/VJIFlrP.jpg
Then you enclose that in img tags on the forum.
__________________
CaseLabs Mercury S3 | AMD 3900X | ROG CH8 Impact | RTX 2080 Super | 32GB DDR4 | 1TB NVMe
Acer Predator Z35P
|

22-08-19, 10:58 PM
|
OC3D Elite
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: France
Posts: 1,711
|
|
5421cb, Intel i9-9900K, 5.1Ghz, 2666MHz DDR4, Windows 10, FTLN
|

08-09-19, 03:06 AM
|
 |
Newbie
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 41
|
|
MT
4697cb, Xeon E5 2683 v3, 3.0GHz, 1100MHz DDR4, Windows 10, Thanos
ST
284cb, Xeon E5 2683 v3, 3.1GHz, 1100MHz DDR4, Windows 10, Thanos
FWIW not seeing a difference in performance with or without fixes. If anything slightly better after patching.
|

27-11-19, 07:31 PM
|
OC3D Elite
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: France
Posts: 1,711
|
|
10797cb, 7980XE, 4.7ghz, 3200mhz DDR4, Windows 10, FTLN
|

26-12-19, 02:26 PM
|
 |
OC3D Elite
|
|
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Durham
Posts: 1,558
|
|
Update
3655, Ryzen 5 3600, 3200mhz DDR4. Windows 10, Rob
__________________
ASUS ROG Crosshair VII wifi | Ryzen 5 3600 | Custom Loop | Patriot Viper Steel 4133 @ 3600 2 x 8Gb | Asus Strix RX 470 | Samsung 500gb nvme | Samsung 1Tb nvme | Samsung Evo 120gb ssd | Seagate Barracuda 1tb storage | Toshiba 1Tb HDD | EVGA 500w | Phanteks Entho Pro Tempered Glass | Windows 10 and Linux Manjaro
|

19-01-20, 05:37 PM
|
 |
OC3D Elite
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 15,236
|
|
Hmm.
Thought I'd bring this up again as I moaned about it being inconsistent.
I was right, and I'll tell you how I know.
I timed a R15 run on my 14 core. I then timed a run on my 16 core. Sure enough the 16 core was faster. This wasn't just something I dreamed up, it was a thing. A noticeable thing.
Yet, the 16 core scored 200 points lower. I tried this in R20 and even though the 16 core is 200mhz slower the 16 core was still faster, yet, the score was lower.
So I thought O.K this is probably unique to me because I'm using oddball hardware.
Nope.
I watched a Jayz video and he had exactly the same issue. I've been watching his new build, and I think that led me to a TR review.
How can a CPU that renders a bench faster actually score less points? Surely the faster the better right?
So I call shenanigans, and I don't trust this bench further than I could throw it.
__________________
If you don't like what I post don't read it.
|

20-01-20, 10:38 PM
|
 |
OC3D Elite
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Nottingham UK
Posts: 1,161
|
|
MT 7062, ST 495, Ryzen 3900X at stock clocks cooled by a Kraken X42, Gigabyte X570 ITX mobo, 32gb GSkill 3600mhz, 2tb Corsair MP600
__________________
|

21-01-20, 08:40 AM
|
OC3D Elite
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Norway, Oslo
Posts: 7,220
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlienALX
Hmm.
Thought I'd bring this up again as I moaned about it being inconsistent.
I was right, and I'll tell you how I know.
I timed a R15 run on my 14 core. I then timed a run on my 16 core. Sure enough the 16 core was faster. This wasn't just something I dreamed up, it was a thing. A noticeable thing.
Yet, the 16 core scored 200 points lower. I tried this in R20 and even though the 16 core is 200mhz slower the 16 core was still faster, yet, the score was lower.
So I thought O.K this is probably unique to me because I'm using oddball hardware.
Nope.
I watched a Jayz video and he had exactly the same issue. I've been watching his new build, and I think that led me to a TR review.
How can a CPU that renders a bench faster actually score less points? Surely the faster the better right?
So I call shenanigans, and I don't trust this bench further than I could throw it.
|
I wonder if the weighting is being biased. Wouldnt be the first time we see that. Either that or its a genuine miscalculation. Perhaps their calculations per core are inaccurate leading to this lower score.
|

23-01-20, 02:02 AM
|
 |
Resident Newb
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Ye Olde England
Posts: 14,624
|
|
My ex 9900K which was overclocked to 4.80GHz vs my new 3950X using PBO in the bios to auto boost clocks, Quite impressed, Didn't do single core as I was just interested to see multi, I've seen people doing an actual overclock and getting well over 10k so I may try it later.
__________________
The majority of people on this planet have a disease I like to call "The Dumb".
|
 |
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|