OC3D Cinebench R20 Benchmark Thread

[KingNosser]

Originally Posted by Warchild

change the link to [img] maybe?

I tried that obviously Idk is odd

ty for fix, the link I got didn't have the .jpg but it's handy info for another time

[hmmblah]

Originally Posted by KingNosser

I tried that obviously Idk is odd

I fixed your post. What you need to do is open the link you posted, then right click on the image and copy link address. It will have a .jpg on the end of it:

https://i.imgur.com/VJIFlrP.jpg

Then you enclose that in img tags on the forum.

[FTLN]

5421cb, Intel i9-9900K, 5.1Ghz, 2666MHz DDR4, Windows 10, FTLN

[Thanos]

MT
4697cb, Xeon E5 2683 v3, 3.0GHz, 1100MHz DDR4, Windows 10, Thanos

ST
284cb, Xeon E5 2683 v3, 3.1GHz, 1100MHz DDR4, Windows 10, Thanos




FWIW not seeing a difference in performance with or without fixes. If anything slightly better after patching.

[FTLN]

10797cb, 7980XE, 4.7ghz, 3200mhz DDR4, Windows 10, FTLN

[RobM]

Update
3655, Ryzen 5 3600, 3200mhz DDR4. Windows 10, Rob

[AlienALX]

Hmm.

Thought I'd bring this up again as I moaned about it being inconsistent.

I was right, and I'll tell you how I know.

I timed a R15 run on my 14 core. I then timed a run on my 16 core. Sure enough the 16 core was faster. This wasn't just something I dreamed up, it was a thing. A noticeable thing.

Yet, the 16 core scored 200 points lower. I tried this in R20 and even though the 16 core is 200mhz slower the 16 core was still faster, yet, the score was lower.

So I thought O.K this is probably unique to me because I'm using oddball hardware.

Nope.

I watched a Jayz video and he had exactly the same issue. I've been watching his new build, and I think that led me to a TR review.

How can a CPU that renders a bench faster actually score less points? Surely the faster the better right?

So I call shenanigans, and I don't trust this bench further than I could throw it.