Go Back   Overclock3D Forums > [OC3D] Cooling Forum > Liquid Cooling
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
  #1  
Old 24-01-07, 02:20 PM
ai_01 ai_01 is offline
OC3D Crew
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 945
Water block (GT/Fuzion/Storm) test results...

I thought this might be useful for those looking for a watercooling upgrade.

Quote:
Originally Posted by virtualrain
Here is a summary of the recent Fuzion, Apogee GT, and Storm test results that I've found to date...

Notes:

- If multiple mounts were done and results provided, I've indicated that and averaged the mounts/runs.

- Review the test methodology details and test result details by clicking the links

- All values are in deg C unless otherwise stated

- Quad core load temps as reported by core temp or TAT were averaged by the testers and sometimes the difference between cores was as much as 10 deg C. According to Philly_boy lapping seemed to reduce difference in cores significantly.

H20 Frag-monger (Apogee vs. Storm R2 vs. Fuzion)

CPU: X6800 OC to 3.8GHz

WC Gear: MCP-655, MCR-220

Test SW: TAT

DT Results: Apogee = 55.8, Storm = 51.7, Fuzion = 49.5

Winner: Fuzion beats Apogee by 6.3 and Storm by 2.2

Link: http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=152

H20 Frag-monger (Apogee vs. Storm R2 vs. Fuzion)

CPU: N/A - 30x30mm 100W die

WC Gear: Lytron chiller

Test SW: N/A

DT Results: N/A (C/W Curves)

C/W Results @ 1GPM: Apogee = 0.064, Storm = 0.059, Fuzion = 0.057

Pressure Drop @ 1GPM: Apogee = 2PSI, Storm = 5PSI, Fuzion = 0.5PSI

C/W Winner: @100W/1GPM Fuzion beats Apogee by 0.7 and Storm by 0.2

PSI Winner: @1GPM Fuzion has 25% and 10% of the pressure drop of Apogee/Storm

Link: http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=304

Nikhsub1 (Storm G5 vs. Fuzion vs Apogee GT)

CPU: E6700 OC to 3.85GHz @ 1.56Vcore

WC Gear: 2xDDC Ultra, PA-120.3

Test SW: TAT

DT Results (avg of 3 mounts each): Storm G5 = 39.08, Fuzion = 43.06, Apogee GT (flat) = 44.54

Mount variation in DT: Storm 2 deg, Fuzion 2 deg, Apogee GT = 4.5 deg

Winner: Storm G5 beats Fuzion by 3.98 and Apogee GT by 5.46

Link: http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...1&postcount=10

FreeCableGuy (Storm R2 vs Apogee vs Fuzion vs Apogee GT)

CPU: X3220 Quad Core

WC Gear: D5, PA120.3

Test SW: Prime95 x4

DT Results (@150W): Apogee = 25, Storm = 26.5, Fuzion = 24, Apogee GT 24

Winner: Fuzion and Apogee GT very close and beat Apogee by 1 and Storm by 2.5 (@150W)

Link1: http://www.thetechrepository.com/showthread.php?t=85

Link2: http://www.thetechrepository.com/showthread.php?t=78

Link3: http://www.thetechrepository.com/showthread.php?t=84

Philly_Boy CES Showdown Part 1 (Apogee GT vs. Fuzion)

CPU: X6700 Quad Core OC to 3.6GHz @ 1.425Vcore

WC Gear: MCP-655, MCR-320

Test SW: CPU Burn 5

DT Results: Apogee GT (Bow?) = 42.1 (1 run), Fuzion = 38.2 (avg. of 3 runs on 2 mounts)

Winner: Fuzion beats Apogee GT (Bow?) by 3.9

Link: http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...0&postcount=84

Philly_Boy CES Showdown Part 2 (Apogee GT vs. Fuzion)

CPU: X6700 Quad Core (lapped) OC to 3.466GHz @ 1.5Vcore

WC Gear: MCP-655, MCR-320

Test SW: CPU Burn 5

DT Results: Apogee GT (flat) = 41.7, Apogee GT (Bow) = 34.1, Fuzion = 38.78 (avg. of 2 mounts)

Winner: Apogee GT (Bow) beats Apogee GT (flat) by 7.6 and Fuzion by 4.68

Link: http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=130142

Shimano (VR-Zone) (Apogee GT vs. Storm Vs. MCP-05 Pro)

CPU: X6700 Quad Core OC to 3.615GHz @ 1.7Vcore

WC Gear: D5, 2x120mm Rad?

Test SW: CPU Burn

DT Results (from Asus Probe): Apogee GT (flat) = 58, Storm = 60, MCP-05 Pro = 56

Winner: MCP-05 Pro beats GT (flat) by 2 and Storm by 4

Link: http://www.vr-zone.com/?i=4476&s=1

My conclusions so far:

Given the fact that all tests by the same testers varied by up to 2-4 degrees just by remounting or doing another run and the fact that all blocks are typically within a few degrees of each other (and often much less) I would say it's impossible to declare any block definitively superior to another so far.

Given this, I think any testing without multiple and equal number of remounts for each block can be very misleading. For example, Nikhsub1's tests show that the Fuzion could win by 4 degrees or lose by 1 degree to the GT depending on which mount and run you used to compare. With the mount making as much as a 5 degree difference on blocks that typically only differ by a couple of degrees it makes drawing conclusions from limited runs/mounts dubious at best. :slapass:

The only thing that everyone seems to agree on is that the Fuzion flows significantly better than any other CPU block giving it a distinct advantage in multi-block loop performance.

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 24-01-07, 02:28 PM
Ham Ham is offline
OC3D Elite
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,981
Didn't philly post this?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 24-01-07, 02:35 PM
ai_01 ai_01 is offline
OC3D Crew
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 945
nope. this was actually posted @ XS last night
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 24-01-07, 11:33 PM
Allsorts Allsorts is offline
Advanced Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 270
Interesting results. I always wondered if one waterblock would dominate when it came to watercooling double die CPUs. The small temperature differences between the blocks is reminiscent of single die CPU waterblock head-to-head results.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump






All times are GMT. The time now is 07:57 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.