AMD Fury X2 specifications confirmed, launch within two months

AverageNinja

AverageNinja

Average Penis Too
Tech site WCCFtech has confirmed the specifications of the upcoming Dual Fury-XT GPU, codenamed 'Gemini'. They also stated that the card will launch at the end of November / beginning of December.

02054411476l.jpg


Read more on the 'Fury X2' specifications and launch window.
 
If the TDP is indeed 375W for this one, then I guess the performance of this card is heavily TDP limited. I mean a Fury-X has a TDP of 375W alone...
To me it sound more like two Nanos stuffed together. So probably this is not the card we hoped it would be. :eek:
 
barnsley said:
YES FINALLY. Heres hoping it'll be worth the wait.
Click to expand...

Judging by the specifications, it might just perform about the same as two Fury X's in CrossFire. It that's the case, AMD will have a killer GPU on their hands. Especially since CrossFire with the Fury cards seems to scale very well.

Breit said:
If the TDP is indeed 375W for this one, then I guess the performance of this card is heavily TDP limited. I mean a Fury-X has a TDP of 375W alone...
To me it sound more like two Nanos stuffed together. So probably this is not the card we hoped it would be. :eek:
Click to expand...

The Fury X has a TDP of 275w actually. I was surprised to see that the TDP was only 375w too, though. It seems quite low. Can't wait to see some actual performance numbers.
 
AverageNinja said:
Judging by the specifications, it might just perform about the same as two Fury X's in CrossFire. It that's the case, AMD will have a killer GPU on their hands. Especially since CrossFire with the Fury cards seems to scale very well.



The Fury X has a TDP of 275w actually. I was surprised to see that the TDP was only 375w too, though. It seems quite low. Can't wait to see some actual performance numbers.
Click to expand...

it looks like AMD will be running this at lover clocks than the Fury X, which explains the lower TDP. Perhaps this will act more like dual Fury nano GPUs, or somewhere between dual nano/dual Fury X.

If it uses a variable clock speed like the nano it will achieve Dual Fury X like speeds by simply increasing the power slider in CCC.
 
WYP said:
it looks like AMD will be running this at lover clocks than the Fury X, which explains the lower TDP. Perhaps this will act more like dual Fury nano GPUs, or somewhere between dual nano/dual Fury X.

If it uses a variable clock speed like the nano it will achieve Dual Fury X like speeds by simply increasing the power slider in CCC.
Click to expand...

Put a water block on it, and I'm sure it'll be easy to get that, or dual Fury X oc'd speeds (since you can usually overclock them only a couple MHz...)
 
AMDs dual cards are to die for. There is no way one of these will ever grace my pc unless one of you needs a kidney?
 
Why does this card have to come out at the END of November, why cant it be the start so I could have picked this up in Hong Kong xD
 
MattyD7829 said:
AMDs dual cards are to die for. There is no way one of these will ever grace my pc unless one of you needs a kidney?
Click to expand...

I'm not in need of a kidney but how about one of your lungs? lol :D

I'm guessing project Quantum cannot be to far behind this, hopefully they aren't going to use one of their current gen processors. their single core performance is still way behind Intels
 
I wonder if it will come with a 240mm AIO water cooler. Surely a 120mm one will just boil and explode :)
 
It'll probably be a 240 AIO. A 120/140 would have to have some really loud fans to stay in check.. even then probably run really hot.
 
AMD wants to keep a 120 rad to increase case compatibility. My preference would be a 240, or even a 360 would be the berries. This would kill all mini sales.And I doubt we would ever see it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

WYP
AMD Teases R9 Fury X2 GPU
2
Replies
29
Views
6K
AngryGoldfish
AngryGoldfish
WYP
AMD R9 Fury X2 launching in December
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
jimma47
jimma47
T
Build Log: Inversion
Replies
16
Views
5K
tannji
T
WYP
AMD Hawaii XTX Core confirmed? 3000+ cores!
2
Replies
29
Views
5K
SieB
SieB
madness777
A story worthy of a Thread?
Replies
3
Views
3K
Excalabur50
Excalabur50
Back
Top