Go Back   Overclock3D Forums > [OC3D] General Forums > OC3D Reviews & Videos
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
  #1  
Old 19-07-13, 10:30 AM
tinytomlogan's Avatar
tinytomlogan tinytomlogan is offline
The Guvnor
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: TTL Towers
Posts: 16,162
Gigabyte Z87X-OC Review

At the weather heats up, we take a look at the latest in the OC range from Gigabyte, the Z87X.






Continue Reading

__________________
If you recommend a product LINK THE REVIEW


Get along or run along. Your choice
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 19-07-13, 12:07 PM
mArTyN's Avatar
mArTyN mArTyN is offline
OC3D Crew
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: North East England
Posts: 616
Beautiful board
__________________
Main Rig-Intel i7 2600K @4.4Ghz-Gigabyte P67 UD7-Asus 6950 Direct cu11-16gig Mushkin 2133mhz Redline Ridgeback-Corsair AX860i-Corsair Obsidian 800D-Bitfenix/Noiseblocker Fans-Custom CPU water cooling loop.
Folding Rig- AMD Phenom 9950 Black Edition-Corsair H100i-Asus Crosshair-EVGA GTX560Ti 448 core Classified-8gig Crucial Ballistix Tracer-Corsair AX850-Coolermaster Cosmos S-Corsair case fans.

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 19-07-13, 12:16 PM
AverageNinja's Avatar
AverageNinja AverageNinja is offline
Average Penis Too
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,351
Yay! Finally!
I've been looking out to this review!
I'm going to read it now
__________________
Antique Rig
AMD Sempron 2400+ @ 1,90GHz | NVIDIA GeForce FX5200 | GIGABYTE 7VT600-Rz |
1GB DDR 166,9MHZ RAM | CodeGen 400 Watt
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 19-07-13, 01:04 PM
Etlar Etlar is offline
OC3D Crew
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Denmark
Posts: 636
Sorry to say it TTL, but no Movie ? :O Need some thing to do, when i wait on my parts !
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 19-07-13, 01:49 PM
GoogalyMoogaly GoogalyMoogaly is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 142
Disappointed you didn't cover RAM voltages. I've read in other reviews how many manufacturers (except Asus) don't accurately report RAM voltages in the BIOS. I was wondering fi this board is the same?
Also I believe they dropped the high end audio they've used on some of their OC boards in the past. I see no mention of anything audio related in the review.

The board also annoys me that I'd be paying all that money and if I put it in a case I can't use it. For example the PCI bracket, the overclocking buttons and the internal external USB ports. Would rather it was cheaper and didn't have these. They could make a "Z87X-OC TestBench" version for those that want to use it on a test bench and give the rest of use the other features at a lower price tag.

It's also a little disappointing that they went with a black PCB. They used to be rare, but have become more common in recent times. Pity Gigabyte didn't try to be different and come up with something new, if they're trying something new with could schemes.

That said this board is on my very short shortlist of Z87 boards (along with the Asus Z87 Maximus VI Gene and Hero boards) so it's good to know that it's ok.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 19-07-13, 02:12 PM
VonBlade's Avatar
VonBlade VonBlade is offline
OC3D Elite
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Behind a keyboard
Posts: 1,138
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoogalyMoogaly View Post
Disappointed you didn't cover RAM voltages. I've read in other reviews how many manufacturers (except Asus) don't accurately report RAM voltages in the BIOS. I was wondering fi this board is the same?
If we haven't mentioned it you can assume it's fine.

Quote:
Also I believe they dropped the high end audio they've used on some of their OC boards in the past. I see no mention of anything audio related in the review.
There is only one previous OC board, the X58. That used the ALC889 codec, this uses the ALC892. Everything uses the ALC892 which we mentioned in the technical specifications and is so ubiquitous that further mention (when there are many other features) was pointless.

Quote:
The board also annoys me that I'd be paying all that money and if I put it in a case I can't use it. For example the PCI bracket, the overclocking buttons and the internal external USB ports. Would rather it was cheaper and didn't have these. They could make a "Z87X-OC TestBench" version for those that want to use it on a test bench and give the rest of use the other features at a lower price tag.
Rather nit-picky. Sure you don't use the bracket in a case, but as this is the same price as all the mid-price boards that don't come with one then it's not costing any more. The buttons exist on nearly every motherboard (as power/reset ones at minimum) and yet nobody complains. Again it's not costing more so if you don't use them, ignore them. The internal USB ports were mentioned and explained that if you have a front panel device that utilises USB then it's a compact and simple to use solution.

You're implying that these features somehow make the board expensive, whereas it costs the same as most and so these elements aren't impacting the cost.

Quote:
It's also a little disappointing that they went with a black PCB. They used to be rare, but have become more common in recent times. Pity Gigabyte didn't try to be different and come up with something new, if they're trying something new with could schemes.

That said this board is on my very short shortlist of Z87 boards (along with the Asus Z87 Maximus VI Gene and Hero boards) so it's good to know that it's ok.
I'm so glad you're annoyed that Gigabyte use a black PCB on a black and orange motherboard. It's especially nice to see that the black PCB on all the ASUS motherboards don't dissuade you. Nothing like impartiality. Surely a blue PCB with black and orange plastic would be worse..?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 19-07-13, 05:53 PM
GoogalyMoogaly GoogalyMoogaly is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 142
Quote:
Originally Posted by VonBlade View Post
If we haven't mentioned it you can assume it's fine.
Seems sensible. Wasn't sure if it wasn't worth mentioning or if you hadn't checked it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by VonBlade View Post
There is only one previous OC board, the X58. That used the ALC889 codec, this uses the ALC892. Everything uses the ALC892 which we mentioned in the technical specifications and is so ubiquitous that further mention (when there are many other features) was pointless.
Fair enough. How is the onboard sound on this board? Does it get suffer much from the effects that some boards feel the need to shield their audio against? (I can't say I've ever had much issue from onboard sound from a quality point of view)

Quote:
Originally Posted by VonBlade View Post
Rather nit-picky. Sure you don't use the bracket in a case, but as this is the same price as all the mid-price boards that don't come with one then it's not costing any more. The buttons exist on nearly every motherboard (as power/reset ones at minimum) and yet nobody complains. Again it's not costing more so if you don't use them, ignore them. The internal USB ports were mentioned and explained that if you have a front panel device that utilises USB then it's a compact and simple to use solution.

You're implying that these features somehow make the board expensive, whereas it costs the same as most and so these elements aren't impacting the cost.
I'm suggesting it makes the board more expensive yes. If these features cost nothing why aren't they on every board? I'm pretty sure if they cost Gigabyte money to include, they'll charge the end user for them. Can't blame them for it either.
Are those USB ports USB 2 or 3? I thought they were 2. Most USB front panels that I can think of use internal USB2 headers. In fact it's only a few cases that I can think of that decided it'd be a good idea to use external USB connectors on front panel connectors.
And all the onboard buttons do annoy me, but mostly just the ones that don't have external access. So Power and Reset bother me less, but when boards don't have an external (i.e. rear panel) CMOS reset then that annoys me a bit. I mean I don't lose sleep over it, but if I'm paying money for something and 1 thing has it and 1 doesn't then it may affect my overall decision.

Quote:
Originally Posted by VonBlade View Post
I'm so glad you're annoyed that Gigabyte use a black PCB on a black and orange motherboard. It's especially nice to see that the black PCB on all the ASUS motherboards don't dissuade you. Nothing like impartiality. Surely a blue PCB with black and orange plastic would be worse..?
I'm sorry, you'll have to point out where I said Asus using black PCBs didn't annoy me, I can't see it. It hasn't dissuaded me any more on the Gigabyte than the Asus boards.
You are right though a blue PCB with black and orange would be worse. Maybe a white PCB for a change (I believe some KFA2 graphics cards use white)? Admittedly orange and white may not go well together, but no rule sayign they have to use orange. I'm pretty sure some of the X58 OC range were purely black and orange so it doesn't seem like they're opposed to changing it.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 19-07-13, 07:08 PM
antihero's Avatar
antihero antihero is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 203
Sweet jesus man 5.1 GHz screenie with a freakin' AIO cooler. I would give my left nut for a chip like that.
__________________
4770K || GIGABYTE Z87X-OC || SLI GTX 780 || Team 2133C9 || Samsung 830 256GB || XSPC Raystorm || Hardware Labs SR-1 || Gentle Typhoon AP-15 || 2 x Aquacomputer D5 || 2 x Aquacomputer D5 pump tops || Aquacomputer Aqualis || Windows 7 || ViewSonic VP2770 || AX760 || 900D
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 20-07-13, 02:39 AM
Joao Dario Joao Dario is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Portugal
Posts: 12
damn is that board that good ??
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 20-07-13, 02:44 AM
Gilles3000 Gilles3000 is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 5
thx for another great review, seems like a great board especially considering the price.I might consider this motherboard for my upcoming build.

I have a couple of little questions tho,

The benchmarks of the VI extreme, were those with the "old" driver that you used for its review, or did you use a new driver?

The 4770k you used, was that a review sample or a consumer chip? I'm only asking because I haven't seen many people that have been able to clock their chip that high without delidding or extreme cooling.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump






All times are GMT. The time now is 07:32 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.