Roooker
New member
Some of you might know the site www.pcper.com. In case you do not know it check it out. They so great Hardware rewievs and stuff.
So back to the topic:
AMD Crossfire is a lying at frame rates.
Simple as that. Dont believe me ? Check this rewiev. Please read it seriously because it is quite complicated.
Here
Just wanted to know what you guys think and maybe we can get Tom to make a vid about that, because i think it is a pretty big issue.
Here is just an idea on what the whole issue is about:
Everyone until now has seen that as the results. We see that a 7970 GHz Edition is little better that the 680. Also if we do the crossfire and sli comparisons.
BUT now look at this graph:
That the the result of the exact same test just somehow different. Take a look at the 7970 crossfire result. Almost the same as a single 7970.
So what observed means is ... this is taking too long to explain just watch the video
Everything is explained there.
So back to the topic:
AMD Crossfire is a lying at frame rates.
Simple as that. Dont believe me ? Check this rewiev. Please read it seriously because it is quite complicated.
Here
Just wanted to know what you guys think and maybe we can get Tom to make a vid about that, because i think it is a pretty big issue.
Here is just an idea on what the whole issue is about:

Everyone until now has seen that as the results. We see that a 7970 GHz Edition is little better that the 680. Also if we do the crossfire and sli comparisons.
BUT now look at this graph:

That the the result of the exact same test just somehow different. Take a look at the 7970 crossfire result. Almost the same as a single 7970.
So what observed means is ... this is taking too long to explain just watch the video
