Go Back   Overclock3D Forums > [OC3D] General Forums > Overclock3D Reviews
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
  #1  
Old 22-10-12, 08:13 AM
tinytomlogan's Avatar
tinytomlogan tinytomlogan is offline
The Guvnor
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: TTL Towers
Posts: 11,938
ASUS 7970 Matrix Platinum



We finally get our hands on the top-line HD7970 from ASUS, the Matrix Platinum. Has it been worth the lengthy wait?


Continue Reading

__________________
my baby is blue..... atm
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 22-10-12, 09:25 AM
B NEGATIVE's Avatar
B NEGATIVE B NEGATIVE is offline
OC3D Crew
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 565
Harsh but fair.
__________________
SR-2-2x X5650 Xeons-3x 670 FTW-1x 120Gb Force GT-1x 240Gb Force GT-1tb WD Green-12Gb Dom GT 1866-Platimax 1500w-2x HK3-2xD5-24v controller-3x RX 480's-3x NiBlk HK GPU blocks-Koolance tops-BP res-15x SP120's-Little Devil V8.


Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 22-10-12, 09:44 AM
233Kosta's Avatar
233Kosta 233Kosta is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 71
Unhappy Shame really :(

I always hate to see good manufacturers righteously get their bollocks handed to them (Except for NZXT, that was pretty funny!)

ASUS could have at least sent a cherry picked review sample, so they wouldn't look as bad.

By the way, Tom, is it planned for the future to get the graphs in HTML5 instead of Flash (or some sort of compromise). I went on this on a mobile device and none of the numbers would show.
__________________
TOP
Bench
24/7
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 22-10-12, 10:42 AM
CPMFW's Avatar
CPMFW CPMFW is offline
OC3D Elite
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Colchester, UK
Posts: 1,514
its a lovely designed card but the performence is really disappointing...
tom was swearing and that doesnt happen often
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 22-10-12, 10:56 AM
Vicey Vicey is offline
Advanced Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 445
Disappointing. Asus make great motherboards but their GPU's feel more fluff than substance.

I really get the sense that they are using the Republic of Gamers branding on products that aren't really that premium. If they continue to dilute the brand it will become worthless. I also don't think the lights on the side of the card are a good idea, makes it look like a cheap afterthought to distract from the cards main fault: Performance.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 23-10-12, 12:09 AM
badtaylorx's Avatar
badtaylorx badtaylorx is offline
Advanced Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: maine usa
Posts: 336
idk tom.... i think you got a dud....

the platinums ARE cherry picked...hence the "Platinum"
__________________

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/2716743 highest 2500k+560Ti SLI TO DATE!!!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 23-10-12, 12:42 AM
tristan tristan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: B.C. Canada
Posts: 140
if they are cherry picked then they are doing a bad job of it given that tom had a chip that wouldn't go past 1200. i definitly had higher hopes for this card...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 23-10-12, 12:45 AM
Josh Weston's Avatar
Josh Weston Josh Weston is offline
The Apprentice
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Essex, UK
Posts: 3,310
Send a message via MSN to Josh Weston
Cherry picking suggests that they've been tested in-house by the manufacturer, right? As Tristan says, they're obviously not doing it right.
__________________


Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 23-10-12, 01:04 AM
tristan tristan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: B.C. Canada
Posts: 140
For the price of this card you can get a gtx 680 that comes with a factory overclock of 1200 if asus's "cherry picking" process allows a chip that can only do 1200 then somthing is wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 23-10-12, 01:36 AM
airdeano's Avatar
airdeano airdeano is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: north little rock, arkansas USA
Posts: 2,642
reading other print reviews of this same card and you'd think there was a
different version becasue they are all upside-down giddy with the results.
comparo to GTX and gains over the reference cards, you'd thought the 2nd
coming was in this card. dribble... just dribble.. cost to performance ratio is
so lope-sided.

"....11% performance improvement over the regular HD 7970 and a 3% boost
over the HD 7970 GHz and MSI HD 7970 Lightning." for 35-40% more cost to
the Lightning?
but nobody else is barking about the low frequency clocking ability. edged by the
PowerColor at more cost?
should have been stomped a mud-hole in the competitions butt on this purchase.
but instead "edged-out" by its competitor..

ASUS good for you, but i think this is not a great card from the stables of ROG
performance line..

another spot-on point was the RBG lighting and the control. Corsair Link was
getting similar flack on the "effect" and gave "ownership" to the end-user instead
of locking them out. same aurguement, "oohh it changes under load.." obvious
reply, "MEH".

just my opinion...

airdeano
__________________
3770k|ASUS MVF|EVGA 670 SLI|Corsair Platinum 16GB 2133|CaseLabs SM8|Custom Loop
2700k|ASUS MIVE-Z|EVGA 660ti SLI|G Skill X 16GB 2133|FD Midi|Corsair H100
2500k|ASUS MIVG-Z|EVGA 660ti|Corsair Platinum 8GB 1866|FD Mini|Corsair H100
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump






All times are GMT. The time now is 04:47 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.