Go Back   Overclock3D Forums > [OC3D] Cooling Forum > Liquid Cooling
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
  #1  
Old 21-01-11, 07:34 PM
computer/noob computer/noob is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Milton Keynes, UK
Posts: 137
ive been reading through a few threads and seen that people have recommended going for the RX series of kits rather than the RS... i know that the RS rads are like half the size as RX rads, but for a first go at watercooling is recommended to go for the cheaper kits incase something goes wrong...? or just go all out and start big?

as for wat i would be cooling im am not 100% sure what it will be, possibly 2 GTX560's and eventually a bulldozer CPU (not going to know the sorts of operating tempertaures for either of these for a while)

many thanks in advance for those who help me out

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 21-01-11, 08:01 PM
Lorem-Ipsum Lorem-Ipsum is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 183
You will need at least 2 240 rads to cool that IMO, which means a better pump than the ones that come in the kits too.
__________________


Using Gnu/Linux. "In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates?"

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 21-01-11, 08:02 PM
AMDFTW AMDFTW is offline
OC3D Elite
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Manchester
Posts: 4,536
AMD being as cool as AMD is and if the 560s are even close to how cool the 460's are then a decent 360 would cover it
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 21-01-11, 09:54 PM
DrBoomstick DrBoomstick is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 82
I agree with AMDFTW if the temperatures are in your favour then a 360 should cover it, if they aren't then maybe a little bit more
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 21-01-11, 10:10 PM
computer/noob computer/noob is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Milton Keynes, UK
Posts: 137
i wasnt sure wat hardware i would get, maybe the 360 kit and then a 120 or a 240 on top for extra cooling...? would the bump ok for that as it is rated at 750L/h but i cant remember any other stats for it....

also would the RX be worth the extra cost than the RS series?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 22-01-11, 01:25 AM
ChrisGT ChrisGT is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 83
Quote:
Originally Posted by computer/noob View Post

i wasnt sure wat hardware i would get, maybe the 360 kit and then a 120 or a 240 on top for extra cooling...? would the bump ok for that as it is rated at 750L/h but i cant remember any other stats for it....

also would the RX be worth the extra cost than the RS series?
Throwing more rads into a single loop = pointless. Either do two seperate loops or do 1 loop with 1 rad that can handle the heat. This difference between and RX and an RS is HUGE!

What case are you running? The pump is a pretty good pump dude. The head is a little low but for 1 loop and just 2 cards and a cpu its good enough right on the edge dont go 3 lol. Its quiet which I like alot lol.

BTW no xspx kit is an all out kit lol no where near being all out.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 22-01-11, 11:21 AM
equk's Avatar
equk equk is offline
OC3D Elite
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Southwest England
Posts: 2,572
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisGT View Post

Throwing more rads into a single loop = pointless. Either do two seperate loops or do 1 loop with 1 rad that can handle the heat. This difference between and RX and an RS is HUGE!
Doesn't seem like there's much point in spending loads on a dual loop.

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=254683

Quote:

Conclusions:

Under extreme performance scenarios, and from a pure performance standpoint, dual loops versus single loop are neither better nor worse, under the strict condition that the load ratios are evenly balanced.

Under the most commonly encountered loads though, single loops do win.

Under both of the above use scenarios, single loops also win from a reliability standpoint because of pump redundancy.
I also agree with what AMDFTW said

Quote:
Originally Posted by AMDFTW View Post

AMD being as cool as AMD is and if the 560s are even close to how cool the 460's are then a decent 360 would cover it
Also the whole dual loop thing seems a bit silly, if u have 2 radiators in a single loop you have a higher cooling capability in the same loop. Seperate them and you have 2 loops with a lower capability.

I guess if the GPU's are stupidly hot it could be worth it, but it normally only makes a few degrees difference as u have more cooling capability in the single loop (with 2 rads).

Also if you get a single loop with 2 pumps you have redundancy.

Quote:
Originally Posted by equk View Post

surely if the loop goes:

res/pump > cpu > gpu > rad > rad >

you have cpu at a lowish temp then goes to a higher temp gpu but then before it gets to the cpu again it is cooled via the radiators.

It's not like cpu=35 + gpu=65 total=100
__________________


Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 22-01-11, 02:30 PM
ChrisGT ChrisGT is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 83
Never said there was a point in running two loops for his setup but to throw more rads into 1 loop will gain you a 1* drop if your lucky with a substantial flow drop...

Also res>pump>rad>cpu>gpu
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 22-01-11, 02:51 PM
equk's Avatar
equk equk is offline
OC3D Elite
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Southwest England
Posts: 2,572
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisGT View Post

Never said there was a point in running two loops for his setup but to throw more rads into 1 loop will gain you a 1* drop if your lucky with a substantial flow drop...
soz thought u said to use 2 seperate loops

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisGT View Post

Throwing more rads into a single loop = pointless. Either do two seperate loops or do 1 loop with 1 rad that can handle the heat.
__________________


Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 22-01-11, 02:57 PM
ChrisGT ChrisGT is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 83
Quote:
Originally Posted by equk View Post

soz thought u said to use 2 seperate loops
Sure ya I said either do two separate loops if you are wanting to use two rads OR Run 1 loop with 1 rad that can handle the heat.

At no time did I recommend running two loops I should of said instead of being dumb and putting two rads in one loop they could be better used in two separate loops in where you would actually gain performance or just be smart and buy 1 rad for 1 loop that can handle the heat...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump






All times are GMT. The time now is 03:27 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.