Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisGT
Throwing more rads into a single loop = pointless. Either do two seperate loops or do 1 loop with 1 rad that can handle the heat. This difference between and RX and an RS is HUGE!
|
Doesn't seem like there's much point in spending loads on a dual loop.
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=254683
Quote:
Conclusions:
Under extreme performance scenarios, and from a pure performance standpoint, dual loops versus single loop are neither better nor worse, under the strict condition that the load ratios are evenly balanced.
Under the most commonly encountered loads though, single loops do win.
Under both of the above use scenarios, single loops also win from a reliability standpoint because of pump redundancy.
|
I also agree with what AMDFTW said
Quote:
Originally Posted by AMDFTW
AMD being as cool as AMD is and if the 560s are even close to how cool the 460's are then a decent 360 would cover it
|
Also the whole dual loop thing seems a bit silly, if u have 2 radiators in a single loop you have a higher cooling capability in the same loop. Seperate them and you have 2 loops with a lower capability.
I guess if the GPU's are stupidly hot it could be worth it, but it normally only makes a few degrees difference as u have more cooling capability in the single loop (with 2 rads).
Also if you get a single loop with 2 pumps you have redundancy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by equk
surely if the loop goes:
res/pump > cpu > gpu > rad > rad >
you have cpu at a lowish temp then goes to a higher temp gpu but then before it gets to the cpu again it is cooled via the radiators.
It's not like cpu=35 + gpu=65 total=100 
|