Wiki is a great source of information, and it's been said by many that understand the way it works that u do have to take everything on it with an educated lean cos - well u don't necessarily need to put correct information on it to be right.
Banning the Scientologists tho ? Or banning any1 imo - it's a bad step banning in general imo, what I'd rather is to be more +ve in a way to combat the issues they may have.
I like Scientologists myself. Not because I believe in what they believe or do, but out of all the crazy churches and followings in this messed up world, they have a whole load of style about them. Taken too literally imo with the things they say/do, I can personally see past alot of that, but I can see what they're doing by saying/doing certain things. - alas u gotta think about it.
Bannage = the bad. Debate/counter argument = the good.
Is there another reason for it tho ?!?!