 |
|

27-03-09, 12:03 PM
|
|
OC3D Elite
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 13,679
|
|
|
NVIDIA working on Single-PCB GeForce GTX 295
Is Nvidia getting ready to release a single-PCB GTX295 capable of competing price-wise with the ATI HD4870x2?
NVIDIA working on Single-PCB GeForce GTX 295
|

27-03-09, 03:50 PM
|
|
OC3D Elite
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,053
|
|
At least custom cooling should be easier.
|

27-03-09, 04:11 PM
|
|
OC3D Elite
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,085
|
|
Hmm good news  Price wars ftw
|

27-03-09, 08:16 PM
|
 |
Advanced Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 420
|
|
|
I wonder if it will affect performance in any way... Oh well as monkey said Price Wars FTW!...
|

28-03-09, 11:45 AM
|
 |
OC3D Elite
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 11,331
|
|
|
lol I've seen a number of reports about this. 1 claiming that the pcb reduction will lessen the costs and another claiming the reduction in the cooler required will reduce the manufacturing costs.
IF this card ever gets produced as a 295, I'd not hold my breath on any price differences between the dual and single. More likely this reference board would be used for a 3xx series release sometime in the future.
1 claim is that this card is in production April for release in May ? From an 'nVidia source'. C'mon.
|

28-03-09, 07:47 PM
|
|
OC3D Crew
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 502
|
|
|
nVidia always looking for ways to reduce costs. There gtx range atm have so many more transistors in the core than the Ati competition, matching Ati's prices would eat into nVidias profits considerably.
Putting 2 core on one pcb is the smarter choice. A big chunk of manufacturing costs will be cut off the gtx295.
If this card does come out, I bet shortly after Ati will definatly bring out a HD4890X2 which should whoop a gtx295's ass.:awhip:
edit: This marks the end of dual pcb gfx cards! The R&D spent on this will, be an intestment for nVidia and the following gtx3xx series Will probably use this pcb design for the high end cards as well.
Ed
__________________
Aries 2010 Oc3D Winner
E8400@4.5Ghz 1.4v, Asus commando, HD4870 512mb @ 835/1020, 4gb ballistix @1011, 4.4.4.8, Water, avec thermochill and fuzion, Zalman 850w Braided, Yuraku 24" aou A-MVA panel,
Win 7 64bit pro
|

28-03-09, 07:52 PM
|
 |
Advanced Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 420
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by name='cl0ck_ed'
nVidia always looking for ways to reduce costs. There gtx range atm have so many more transistors in the core than the Ati competition, matching Ati's prices would eat into nVidias profits considerably.
Putting 2 core on one pcb is the smarter choice. A big chunk of manufacturing costs will be cut off the gtx295.
If this card does come out, I bet shortly after Ati will definatly bring out a HD4890X2 which should whoop a gtx295's ass.:awhip:
Ed
|
I wouldn't go that far the GTX295 is a great hard in itself and well a hard act to beat...
|

28-03-09, 07:58 PM
|
|
OC3D Crew
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 502
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by name='OmegaStalker'
I wouldn't go that far the GTX295 is a great hard in itself and well a hard act to beat...
|
Maybe. But the hd4870 1gb isn't that far behind the gtx260 216. And as the hd4890 will be 13% faster clock for clock than the 4870. And its clocked at 850mhz core. So two 4890 cores should be better than the gtx295 if ati get the drivers right.
__________________
Aries 2010 Oc3D Winner
E8400@4.5Ghz 1.4v, Asus commando, HD4870 512mb @ 835/1020, 4gb ballistix @1011, 4.4.4.8, Water, avec thermochill and fuzion, Zalman 850w Braided, Yuraku 24" aou A-MVA panel,
Win 7 64bit pro
|

28-03-09, 08:39 PM
|
|
OC3D Elite
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,190
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by name='cl0ck_ed'
Maybe. But the hd4870 1gb isn't that far behind the gtx260 216. And as the hd4890 will be 13% faster clock for clock than the 4870. And its clocked at 850mhz core. So two 4890 cores should be better than the gtx295 if ati get the drivers right.
|
Gibbo at novatech done some testing and it showed a 30% increase over a 4870 512mb, not sure of the difference between the 4870 512mb and 1GB but i think 13% is an understatement
|

28-03-09, 08:56 PM
|
|
OC3D Crew
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 502
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by name='PeterStoba'
Gibbo at novatech done some testing and it showed a 30% increase over a 4870 512mb, not sure of the difference between the 4870 512mb and 1GB but i think 13% is an understatement
|
13% increase over 4870 1gb clock for clock
750 > 850mhz 13% increase in clock speed aswell
therefore
13 + 13 = 26% increase in performance. There is also a bump in the memory speed.
__________________
Aries 2010 Oc3D Winner
E8400@4.5Ghz 1.4v, Asus commando, HD4870 512mb @ 835/1020, 4gb ballistix @1011, 4.4.4.8, Water, avec thermochill and fuzion, Zalman 850w Braided, Yuraku 24" aou A-MVA panel,
Win 7 64bit pro
|
 |
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|