Call of Duty 6. Or Modern Warfare 2.

VonBlade · #1 06-02-09, 04:56 PM

http://www.fourzerotwo.com/2009/02/04/latest-tweet/

I'll quote it for those who don't like link clicking

Quote:

Reviewing some radio-chatter VO we just finished recording for Modern Warfare 2 today.

“Cujo Two-One this is Vulture, solid copy on all.”

402 is part of Infinity Ward.

So who's up for some proper COD action after the (not unexpected) disaster that was COD5?

VB

monkey7 · #2 06-02-09, 05:05 PM

I hope it's going to own CoD4

zak4994 · #3 06-02-09, 05:10 PM

Oh it'll own CoD4.

And CoD5 wasn't that bad.

Still wondering why they called it CoD:MW2 and not CoD6.

And I hope they get creative with the multiplayer. I'm getting bored of the game types regardless of the map the layed on.

monkey7 · #4 06-02-09, 05:24 PM

Probably because MW has a great name where the CoD series has been quite screwed up by the complete flop CoD5 was.

I hope they are going to allow user programming in the multiplayer modes. Custom made modes ftw.

moogle · #5 06-02-09, 05:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by name='VonBlade'

So who's up for some proper COD action after the (not unexpected) disaster that was COD5?

VB

Me

Can't wait for it TBH. CoD5 was kak I have no idea why I bought it

Although multiplayer is fun but I just can't grasp it as I do with CoD4.

VonBlade · #6 06-02-09, 05:57 PM

Call of Duty 5 should have made everyone alarm bells ring. Let's look at the history.

Company x makes COD. Average. Swamped by the Medal of Honour series.

Company x makes COD2 not bad. Graphically average, and yet more WW2.

Company x makes COD3, poor. Graphically poor. Yet more WW2.

NEW company makes COD4, awesome. Graphics and story are brilliant. Hailed as one of the finest FPS of modern times and finally moves away from killing Germans.

...

Publisher looks at previous history and decides that, of the two companies who've made COD games, the one who produced three blah games with blah graphics and blah setting would be perfect to produce a WW2 based COD5, instead of the genre re-defining people who made 4.

So, was anyone surprised COD5 was terrible? Really??

moogle · #7 06-02-09, 05:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by name='VonBlade'

So, was anyone surprised COD5 was terrible? Really??

Not really, but I didn't expect it to be that crap! You just don't get immersed into the story as you did with CoD4. Too much role switching.

kataras · #8 06-02-09, 06:08 PM

Already waiting for something new to play. But wont agree that cod5 is a bad game, who likes ww2 and pacific war, will find it good, which i have

VonBlade · #9 06-02-09, 06:10 PM

***off-topic***

How can you have a nick like that and not have the red-nosed wonder as your avatar?

***/off-topic***

zak4994 · #10 06-02-09, 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by name='VonBlade'

Call of Duty 5 should have made everyone alarm bells ring. Let's look at the history.

Company x makes COD. Average. Swamped by the Medal of Honour series.

Company x makes COD2 not bad. Graphically average, and yet more WW2.

Company x makes COD3, poor. Graphically poor. Yet more WW2.

NEW company makes COD4, awesome. Graphics and story are brilliant. Hailed as one of the finest FPS of modern times and finally moves away from killing Germans.

...

Publisher looks at previous history and decides that, of the two companies who've made COD games, the one who produced three blah games with blah graphics and blah setting would be perfect to produce a WW2 based COD5, instead of the genre re-defining people who made 4.

So, was anyone surprised COD5 was terrible? Really??

Actually CoD, CoD2 and CoD4 were made by Infinity Ward.