StarDock's Gamers Bill of Rights gets revised

[TopSecret]

The games publisher has revised the Gamers Bill of Rights.

Read the full article here.

[!TIMMY!]

I like it. Fully behind it.

[Jim]

That's the less ambiguous version?

*goes off to read the original*

EDIT: Barring one or two things, I think that the original is much more direct and to the point.

Just me?

[nepas]

I agree with it all,but dont think it will work

Gamers shall have the right to return games that are incompatible or do not function at a reasonable level of performance for a full refund within a reasonable amount of time.

Crysis anyone??

Gamers whose computers meet the posted minimum requirements shall have the right to use their games without being materially inconvenienced due to copy protection or digital rights management.

E.A are you taking a note of this after your latest fiasco's with Mass Effect and Spore?

[Rastalovich]

I find myself wondering why they`re doing this.

[mrapoc]

as much as i support it and hope it works....

it seems a bit gimmicky

[steve30x]

I realy dont know why they are doing this because the developers wont have anything to do with the gamers rights. The Developers and games companies are too greedy and want their pockets filled instead of thinking of the end user.

[Saviour]

i can already hear the guys at the games offices

"o look guys..another gamers bill of rights..quick lets change our years of work to suit this piece of marketing tripe! *laughs all round*"

altho there's nothing generally wrong with it, the stuff about minimum/recommended requirements playing to an adequate level - one man's adequate is another man's "OMFGWTFBBQ SPEED UP!"

[PP Mguire]

Still stupid and ridiculous. We only have the right to whether we purcahse the game or not. Nothing more, nothing less.