Netbust (Netburst) Technology OFFICIALLY a thing of the past.

NickS · #1 12-08-05, 11:07 PM

Read about it in this picture of my local news paper.

Wow, they were suprisingly fast in releasing this info, INQ doesn't even have it.

If your blind and can't read it, oh well, time for some glasses.

FragTek · #2 12-08-05, 11:09 PM

Great catch Nick! This is a huge step in the right direction for Intel... Hopefully with the introduction of the new architecture we can see Intel pick up a lot of the slack they've created for themselves in the last couple of years.

NickS · #3 12-08-05, 11:11 PM

Hopefully!

Eguy · #4 13-08-05, 05:04 AM

TY uncle :bow:

balilu · #5 13-08-05, 08:21 AM

yeah let's hope for the good. maybe intel want to reach 4ghz

enVias · #6 13-08-05, 08:51 AM

Intel can easily reach 4GHz already, the only reason they didn't is because the performance boost wasn't significant and they wanted to focus on releasing their Dual Core proccys.

NickS · #7 13-08-05, 04:13 PM

The only reason they didn't is cause they don't want to have to ship phase-change units with every cpu :rollingla

enVias · #8 14-08-05, 03:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by name='NickS_'

The only reason they didn't is cause they don't want to have to ship phase-change units with every cpu :rollingla

I think if I can get my CPU to 4.4GHz on air with a 3.2GHz they would have no problem

Jim · #9 14-08-05, 09:15 AM

I think that if they did go to 4.0ghz with the current architecture they would find that a lot of the chips would get speed binned and therefore it wouldn't be a cost efficient line to run.

But its good news to hear that Intel are finally pulling their finger out - hopefully we can see some AMD killing processors from them soon.

If they manage that - and with Nvidia's SLI chipset, they'll be back in the runnings for serious gamers

Dav0s · #10 14-08-05, 11:38 AM

i like amd and all, but even my celly was quicker at some things in general windows use.