Originally Posted by name='Bungral'
It wouldn't be a very good one though would it.... Could pay a bit more for a 24" but I think a quality 22" would be better than a cack 24".
you can get a 24" with a MVA/IPS panel for £200
ALL 22" panels are TN+Film panels (less colours = worse reproduction, lower viewing angles, more likely to suffer from backlight bleed, also if overdriven could suffer from ghosting despite being 2ms - Asus have been known for this)
also 24" has a lot higher resolution and obv is bigger
Down to personal preference really but most monitors have the exact same panels in them these days. So saying one is 'cack' because of what is written on the front is a bit inaccurate.